Posted on

A List Physical Therapy Provider’s Training

Providers of Early Intervention Program (EIP) services, including service coordination, are responsible for maintaining complete clinical documentation related to the provision of early intervention services that are authorized on a child’s Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP). Session and service coordination notes document that the early intervention provider delivered certain diagnostic, treatment and/or coordination services to a child and/or caregiver on a particular date. Session notes must be completed by all qualified personnel (i.e. special educator, physical therapist, social worker, etc.), based upon requirements of their profession. Session notes assist payors, parents, early intervention providers, and municipalities to substantiate that services were provided. The notes also assist in assessing the extent to which services are helping the child/family to attain the outcomes contained in the IFSP. Rendering providers must maintain original signed and dated session notes, following each child and family contact, which shall include the child’s name on each note or page; date of service on each note; type of service provided on each note or page; time in and time out on each session note; brief description of the activities occurring and the recipient’s progress made during the session as related to the outcome(s) contained in the IFSP; and the name, title, signature of the person rendering the service and the date the session note was written for each note. The rendering provider must also maintain original service logs signed by the parent or caregiver which document that services were  received by the child on the date and during the period of time as recorded by the provider, for all Early Intervention services provided with the exception of service coordination. When services are delivered in groups, a separate and distinct session note for each child is required. Individual providers, who directly render services to a child and family, must maintain the original signed and dated session notes. Original early intervention records generated by qualified personnel who are employees of a municipality or provider agency should be retained by the respective municipality or provider agency. Service coordination notes must be completed by all initial service coordinators (ISCs) and ongoing service coordinators (OSCs) to fully document all activities related to the performance of their duties. Service coordination notes ensure that all service coordination activities provided on behalf of a child  and family are documented and demonstrate that programmatic and regulatory requirements pertaining to service coordination are carried out. Service coordination notes must fully describe the nature and extent of service coordination services provided and must include the following information: child’s name; date of service; a description of the specific service coordination activity performed; name, date of contact, and purpose of contact for providers or others contacted on behalf of the child and family as necessary to implement the IFSP; start and end time for each contact; name, title (ISC or OSC) and signature of the service coordinator, as applicable. Service coordinators should maintain documentation of activities conducted with text messaging which includes time, to whom the text was sent, and the family are documented and demonstrate that programmatic and regulatory requirements pertaining to service coordination are carried out. Service coordination notes must fully describe the nature and extent of service coordination services provided and must include the following information: child’s name; date of service; a description of the specific service coordination activity performed; name, date of contact, and purpose of contact for providers or others contacted on behalf of the child and family as necessary to implement the IFSP; start and end time for each contact; name, title (ISC or OSC) and signature of the service coordinator, as applicable. Service coordinators should maintain documentation of activities conducted with text messaging which includes time, to whom the text was sent, and the information discussed. If a checklist is used as the service coordination note for a single contact, it must be signed and dated by the SC, and include start and end time for the contact. If a checklist is used across multiple contacts, the SC must indicate start and end time, and date and sign each contact. Alternatively, service coordination notes that are signed, dated, include start and end times, and refer to a checklist for the actual activities performed may be used. Signing multiple notes with one signature is not acceptable; each session note and each service coordination activity for a given date and time must have its own signature.Providers are responsible for delivering Early Intervention Program services to eligible children and their families as authorized by the Early Intervention Official and in conformance with the child’s and family’s Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP), including the duration, frequency, and specific number of sessions. The provider must ensure that all records which verify that services were provided as authorized (including municipality service authorizations, IFSPs, and session notes) are available for examination by oversight agencies. Providers must also maintain documentation when services are not provided as authorized including documentation of the reason a service(s) was not provided. Providers must give timely notification to the parent, service coordinator and/or Early Intervention Official/Designee of any changes in the provider’s ability to deliver services according to the IFSP. Providers must make reasonable efforts to notify the child’s parent within a reasonable period of any temporary inability to deliver services due to illness, emergencies, hazardous weather, or other circumstances. Providers must notify the child’s parent and service coordinator at least five days prior to any scheduled absences due to vacation, professional activities, or other circumstances. Providers must maintain documentation of any such notifications. Documentation must also support that missed visits were rescheduled and delivered to the child and family by the provider, as clinically appropriate, agreed upon by the parent and in conformance with the IFSP. Providers must ensure that make-up sessions occur according to the provisions of the IFSP.

Providers of Early Intervention Program (EIP) services must follow all requirements of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and other applicable legal requirements for confidentiality.

PI-42B: Storage of child/family records must be secure. All records containing personally identifiable information must be maintained in secure locations, such as a file or room that can be locked when unattended. Records must be disposed of using an appropriate method such as shredding.

PI-42C: Off-site storage of child/family records must be secure. Records stored off-site that contain personally identifiable information must be maintained in secure locations, such as a file, room, or storage unit that is locked. The method of retrieving these files must also maintain the confidentiality of these records. Records must be disposed of using an appropriate method such as shredding. When a professional records management company is used for off-site storage of records containing personally identifiable information, confidentiality requirements must be followed by this company during the storage, retrieval, and disposal of records. The provider’s contract with this company must meet all confidentiality requirements of FERPA and Title 34 CFR applicable to child/family records within the EIP.

PI-42E: Confidentiality of electronic records that are stored on computer must be maintained. Internal controls must be in place when information is stored on computers that limit access to authorized staff within an agency or to the individual provider. This includes, but is not limited to, password protection and secure storage of discs, CD’s, DVD’s and/or other removable storage devices.PI-42F: Confidentiality must be maintained when e-mail is used. Due to the potential for breach of confidentiality, child specific identifiable information may not be transmitted via e-mail unless rigorous administrative, technical and physical safeguards are in place including, but not limited to, password.protection, firewall software, and encryption. Email communication of personally identifiable information takes place exclusively on a Secure Socket Layer encrypted server.

All parties involved in the sending and receipt of an electronic record must be able to maintain the confidentiality of that record. Child specific identifiable information includes a list of personal characteristics or other information that would make it possible to identify the child, the parent or other family members with reasonable certainty. In addition to obvious identifiers such as name, address, etc., the combination of facts presented in the e-mail (e.g., initials, family composition, unique diagnosis, heritage, neighborhood, etc.) should not be able to identify a particular family or child.

If the parent is agreeable or requests the use of unencrypted e-mail for communication of personally identifiable information, there is a specific written parental consent which includes specifics of the dangers to breach of confidentiality inherent in using email; parties who will be involved in email communication; and what information will be shared via email.

PI-42G: Confidentiality of faxed information must be maintained. Safeguarding of faxed information requires, but is not limited to, the use of a fax cover sheet that includes a confidentiality statement. The provider must also ensure that the fax recipient maintains a secure site where faxed information would not be accessible to unauthorized personnel or to the general public.

PI-42I: A record must be kept of all individuals, other than authorized individuals, who access a child’s record, including the date of access and the purpose for which the record was accessed. When this access log contains multiple child names, there is a method for maintaining the confidentiality of each child/family.

PI-42J: Parents must be notified of the process that they must follow to inspect and review all records pertaining to their child. This notification should include a description of the process including how parents would make the request to the rendering provider, who they must speak to, and other details. If a parent is unable to submit a request to review records in writing, a verbal request should be accepted. The provider’s written policy must describe this process.

PI-42K: Parental access to their child’s record must be ensured by the rendering provider. Access to records includes: a review of the record by the parent or a representative on behalf of the parent unless such access is prohibited under State or federal law; an explanation and interpretation of material included in any EI record from the rendering provider upon request; and a copy of any record from the rendering provider within 10 working days of the request (if the request is made as part of mediation or an impartial hearing, a copy must be provided within 5 days.)

PI-42M: The procedure to address amendment of their child’s records must protect the parent’s rights. The parent has the right to request an amendment to their child’s record to the rendering provider when the parent believes the information contained in the record is inaccurate, misleading, or violates the privacy or other rights of their child. If the rendering provider decides not to amend the record as requested, the rendering provider informs the Early Intervention Official (EIO) of this decision. The Early Intervention Official is responsible for informing the parent in writing of the provider’s decision not to amend the record and that the parent has the right to a hearing. The hearing will be conducted by an individual designated by the municipality who does not have a direct interest in the outcome of the hearing. If information in the record is found to be inaccurate, misleading, or to violate the privacy of the child/family, the rendering provider will amend the information and will inform the family’s service coordinator. The service coordinator is required to ensure the contents of the record are amended as requested and notify the parent of the amendment in writing or provide a verbal explanation in their dominant language unless not feasible to do so.

PI-42O: Written parental consent must be obtained before personally identifiable information is disclosed to anyone other than authorized individuals. Written parental consent for release of or obtaining information must include the entity releasing and the entity obtaining the information; which records will be obtained or released; the purpose for the disclosure of information; the date the parent signed the consent; and the signature of the person in parental authority and their relationship to the child. Only information appropriate to a request should be released.

PI-42Q: The provider must have a confidentiality procedure to protect sensitive information (such as sexual or physical abuse, treatment for mental illness or mental health problems, HIV status, communicable disease status, the child’s parentage, etc.). HIV-related information can only be disclosed if the parent signs the New York State form for Release of Medical Information and Confidential HIV Related Information (DOH 2557) or New York State Department of Health, Authorization for Release of Health Information (Including Alcohol/Drug Treatment and Mental Health Information) and Confidential HIV/AIDS Information, (DOH 5032). All written disclosures of confidential HIV information must be accompanied by a statement prohibiting re-disclosure. Agency providers must identify a staff person who has the responsibility for guaranteeing the confidentiality of sensitive information.

PI-42S: The electronic record process allows for determination of the date, time and author of the original entry. The electronic record system prevents the record from being altered after it was created by an unauthorized individual allowing only access by the author or persons that have appropriate access rights to this record, such as administrators. The electronic record process allows for corrections and amendments, and documents the date, time and name of the person who made the change. In instances where paper records are scanned, the author must have signed the document before it was scanned or it was signed by means of electronic signature. The scanned documents must be retained in a secure manner. If entries to the electronic record are menu driven, such as drop down or check box for fields such as service type, location, method of intervention, child’s response, carryover, CPT/ICD codes, etc., they are appropriate to the service(s) provided and the rendering provider is identified as having selected the entry. The provider has set up a system of internal controls that ensure that actual completed service delivery drives Early Intervention claim submission, as well as Medicaid and third party billing. Electronic records are accessible, for program monitoring, fiscal auditing and other auditing activities without the need for special programming, software, language etc.

PI-42T: Agency providers must ensure that all employees, independent contractors, consultants, and volunteers with access to personally identifiable information complete annual confidentiality training. The agency must have a written policy that states how the staff is kept informed of confidentiality requirements (i.e., annual confidentiality training). The agency must also maintain documentation of annual confidentiality training.

Agency providers must employ and/or subcontract with only those individuals who are qualified to deliver services according to the New York State Department of Health’s Early Intervention Program qualified personnel requirements. Agency providers must have a process that includes verification at the time of initial hire by checking the State Education Department, Office of Professions, or Office of Teaching websites. They must have a process in place that includes periodic checks of the State Education Department, Office of Professions, or Office of Teaching websites, to ensure employees and contractors have current credentials. The provider’s written policy should describe both initial and periodic verification of provider qualifications via these websites.

The agency must have a process for ensuring that all employees/subcontractors providing service coordination are qualified in accordance with Early Intervention Program (EIP) regulation. Documentation demonstrating the appropriate qualifications of any person delivering service coordination services must be available for review. All individuals providing service coordination must be qualified in accordance with EIP regulation as evidenced by two years’ experience providing service coordination; or one year of service coordination and one year experience in a service setting with infants and toddlers with developmental delays or disabilities; or one year service coordination and an associate degree in health or human services; or a bachelor’s degree in health or human services. Supervision must be carried out for students enrolled in an accredited university training program; individuals with internship, supplementary, or conditional initial certificates; and individuals completing their licensing requirements.

Agency providers who are approved to deliver Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) using ABA aides must comply with early intervention regulation regarding the supervision and qualification of ABA aides, and must have all documentation of requirements available for review.

* If you received notice of immediate remediation for this finding, please attach the corrective action plan immediate remediation response that you have provided to the NY State Department of Health Early Intervention Program.

All agency providers must have written policies and procedures that includes a process for all potential employees or contracted individuals, administrators, consultants, interns or volunteers who will have the potential for regular or substantial contact with children to be screened through the NYSJC before determining whether to hire or allow any such person to have regular and substantial contact with children. Under NYS Social Services Law, all early intervention providers must have procedures and written policies to screen all new or prospective employees, contractors, consultants, and volunteers who will have regular and substantial contact with children receiving early intervention services through the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR). If notice is received from the SCR that a person is the subject of an indicated report of child abuse or maltreatment, it is advisable that the provider seek appropriate legal counsel in making a determination whether to hire an applicant for employment or a consultant who will have the potential for regular and substantial contact with children receiving early intervention services. Please note that employees/contractors who will have substantial contact with children may not deliver services without supervision before the results of the screen are received. Supervision of an employee/contractor who has not yet received clearance from the SCR must be provided by the responsible provider agency. 

All providers must be aware of the procedures to report suspected child abuse and maltreatment according to Sections 413-415 of the New York State Social Services Law. Policies and procedures must demonstrate that individual providers, agency employees and subcontractors are aware of the requirements to report suspected child abuse and maltreatment or to cause a report to be made, including notification to the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR) according to Sections 413-415 of the Social Services Law. All early intervention providers must have policies and procedures in place to address reporting suspected child abuse or maltreatment either directly to the SCR or to an appropriate authority. Providers may make a report directly to the SCR. Reports which are made to the SCR should be made immediately by telephone. Providers may also report suspected child abuse and maltreatment to a responsible party such as the local child protective services, the Early Intervention Official/Designee, the child’s Early Intervention (EI) service coordinator, and/or an EI supervisor. The provider should have a complete written policy that includes a description of the procedure to report suspected child abuse or maltreatment to the SCR or an appropriate authority (SCR, local CPS, EIO/D, EI SC, or an EI supervisor), guidance regarding identifying abuse or maltreatment, and the telephone number(s) to use to report child abuse for non-mandated reporters and mandated reporters.

Providers must ensure that universal precautions are utilized when early intervention services are being delivered. A supply of disposable gloves must be available in the service area, including in home and community settings, to be readily accessible for use in accordance with universal precautions and must be used when in contact with body fluids. Additionally, practice must ensure the use of universal precautions when handling potentially infectious bodily fluids (e.g., blood), including cleaning and disinfecting of soiled surfaces and adequate disposal of waste. A sanitizing solution of 1 tablespoon of bleach in 1 quart of water prepared fresh each day, or an equivalent product, must be used to disinfect when potentially infectious bodily fluids (e.g., blood) are present. If an equivalent product is used for disinfectant purposes, including a commercially prepared product or solution, it must be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and must be stated in writing to be effective against HIV and Hepatitis B and C, and safe for use with young children. Practice must also include the disposal of waste in a secure, leak-proof plastic bag, a sharps container or disposal in covered plastic lined waste cans.

Due to the declared state of emergency for COVID-19, the New York State Department of Health Bureau of Early Intervention is revising the Health and Safety Standards for the Early Intervention Program guidance document. Please be aware that additional guidance will be forthcoming. In the interim, providers should state in their written Health & Safety policies and procedures that they will use cleaning and disinfecting products for handling bodily fluids and soiled surfaces according to the directions on the label for safe and effective usage, and must additionally note that they will update their Health and Safety policies and procedures when the successor document becomes available.

Additionally, it is important to note that the practice of bringing the same toys or other materials into multiple homes and community-based settings during in-person EI service delivery has the potential to transmit COVID-19 or other viral or bacterial infections. Therefore, until further notice, bringing materials and toys from outside into home and community-based settings is strictly prohibited.

Please consult the Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) list of products registered in New York State and identified by the EPA as effective against COVID-19 when used according to label direction, at the following link:

https://www.epa.gov/coronavirus/list-n-advanced-search-page-disinfectants-coronavirus-covid-19

Providers of Early Intervention Program (EIP) services must ensure that only appropriate strategies are used when a child exhibits self-injurious or aggressive behavior that threatens the well-being of the child or others. Corporal punishment, emotional or physical abuse or maltreatment, and the use of aversive intervention in any form are strictly prohibited when providing EIP services. Aversive intervention means an intervention that is intended to induce pain or discomfort to a child for the purpose of modifying or changing a child’s behavior or eliminating or reducing maladaptive behaviors, including but not limited to the following: contingent application of noxious, painful, intrusive stimuli or activities; any form of noxious, painful, or intrusive spray (including water or other mists), inhalant, or tastes; contingent food programs that include the denial or delay of the provision of meals or intentionally altering staple food or drink to make it distasteful; movement limitation used as punishment, including but not limited to helmets and mechanical restraint devices; physical restraints; blindfolds; and, white noise helmets and electric shock. Aversives do not include such interventions as voice control, limited to loud, firm commands; time-limited ignoring of a specific behavior; positive reinforcers such as small amounts of food used as a reward for successful completion of a clinical task or token fines as part of a token economy system; brief physical prompts to interrupt or prevent a specific behavior; or interventions prescribed by a physician for the treatment or protection of the child. The provider’s written policy should clearly prohibit the use of corporal punishment, emotional or physical abuse or maltreatment, and the use of aversive interventions in any form during the provision of EIP services. When physical interventions are needed, training and supervision must be provided to staff on their use. The appropriate people must be informed when a child is exhibiting behaviors requiring intervention including the parent, the service coordinator and/or the Early Intervention Official. Parents cannot be asked to sign waivers or consent forms to allow the provider to use punishments for unwanted behaviors. When self-injurious or aggressive behavior is persistent and ongoing, the provider must take appropriate actions, including seeking the expertise of qualified personnel and obtaining parent approval for interventions. The service coordinator and Early Intervention Official are notified when serious injury occurs to the child or when the child injures others. A behavior management plan must be developed by qualified personnel with appropriate expertise and documented in the child record. The service coordinator is notified when outside expertise is needed to develop a behavior plan. The behavior management plan must be in writing and signed by the parent. The plan must be developed in concert with the child’s family and providers of early intervention services, and other clinical experts as needed. A medical evaluation should be conducted to address medical conditions. The plan should be a result of a thorough assessment of cause or behavioral functions, and should be implemented by appropriately trained individuals. All providers serving the child should have a copy of the behavior management plan. The parent has the right to revoke approval of the plan at any time.

Providers must ensure that their equipment, materials, and toys are in good condition and free of lead or other known safety issues. The provider must have a procedure for regular cleaning of equipment, materials, and toys used in the provision of early intervention services. Toys, equipment, and materials must be isolated and sanitized if used by an ill child. For disinfecting and sanitizing of toys, a soaking solution of 1 teaspoon of bleach in 1 gallon of water prepared fresh each day should be used.

There must be a process for ascertaining that toys are free of lead or other known safety hazards that includes checking new toys, equipment and materials through the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission website before introducing them to children and their families, to ensure the item(s) have not been recalled. Additionally, the website is checked periodically for updates.

Due to the declared state of emergency for COVID-19, the New York State Department of Health Bureau of Early Intervention is revising the Health and Safety Standards for the Early Intervention Program guidance document. Please be aware that additional guidance will be forthcoming. In the interim, providers should state in their written Health & Safety policies and procedures that they will use cleaning and disinfecting products for handling bodily fluids and soiled surfaces according to the directions on the label for safe and effective usage and must additionally note that they will update their Health and Safety policies and procedures when the successor document becomes available. Additionally, it is important to note that the practice of bringing the same toys or other materials into multiple homes and community-based settings during in-person EI service delivery has the potential to transmit COVID-19 or other viral or bacterial infections. Therefore, until further notice, bringing materials and toys from outside into home and community-based settings is prohibited. 

Please consult the Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) list of products registered in New York State and identified by the EPA as effective against COVID-19 when used according to label direction, at the following link: 

All agency providers are required to maintain a quality assurance (QA) plan. Agencies must designate quality assurance professionals for each type of service. The quality assurance professional must be an agency employee who was licensed/certified in their respective profession. Documentation must be maintained that demonstrates the quality assurance activities are consistent with the plan for each type of service.

CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE TEST

Posted on

Service Provider’s Infection Control

Standard precautions are utilized when Early Intervention services are delivered.

Health and Safety Standards for the Early Intervention Program and Frequently Asked Questions Revised – February 2010
Specific criteria that did not meet standard:
The individual provider or one or more agency staff did not describe the following: 
PI-49.3 Interview – The solution to sanitize surfaces, toys or equipment that have been contaminated by blood or bodily fluids is 1 tablespoon of bleach in 1 quart water prepared fresh each day, or an equivalent product effective against HIV and Hepatitis is used.
Technical Assistance for providers:Providers must ensure that universal precautions are utilized when early intervention services are being delivered. A supply of disposable gloves must be available in the service area, including in home and community settings, to be readily accessible for use in accordance with universal precautions and must be used when in contact with body fluids. Additionally, practice must ensure the use of universal precautions when handling potentially infectious bodily fluids (e.g., blood), including cleaning and disinfecting of soiled surfaces and adequate disposal of waste. A sanitizing solution of 1 tablespoon of bleach in 1 quart of water prepared fresh each day, or an equivalent product, must be used to disinfect when potentially infectious bodily fluids (e.g., blood) are present. If an equivalent product is used for disinfectant purposes, including a commercially prepared product or solution, it must be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and must be stated in writing to be effective against HIV and Hepatitis B and C, and safe for use with young children. Practice must also include the disposal of waste in a secure, leak-proof plastic bag, a sharps container or disposal in covered plastic lined waste cans.Due to the declared state of emergency for COVID-19, the New York State Department of Health Bureau of Early Intervention is revising the Health and Safety Standards for the Early Intervention Program guidance document. Please be aware that additional guidance will be forthcoming. In the interim, providers should state in their written Health & Safety policies and procedures that they will use cleaning and disinfecting products for handling bodily fluids and soiled surfaces according to the directions on the label for safe and effective usage, and must additionally note that they will update their Health and Safety policies and procedures when the successor document becomes available.Additionally, it is important to note that the practice of bringing the same toys or other materials into multiple homes and community-based settings during in-person EI service delivery has the potential to transmit COVID-19 or other viral or bacterial infections. Therefore, until further notice, bringing materials and toys from outside into home and community-based settings is strictly prohibited.Please consult the Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) list of products registered in New York State and identified by the EPA as effective against COVID-19 when used according to label direction, at the following link:https://www.epa.gov/coronavirus/list-n-advanced-search-page-disinfectants-coronavirus-covid-19
CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE EXAM.
Posted on

Live healthy, live happy, and live fashionable

One of the top objectives in my life is maintaining my health. Everything else in life is impaired without excellent health.

I make the decision to eat healthily. by selecting wholesome, nourishing foods. I make sure my body has the nourishment it needs to function at its peak. I steer clear of overeating and keep my weight within a reasonable range.

Exercise is crucial for both improving and preserving my life. I work out every day at a level appropriate for my level of fitness. After working out, I feel better emotionally and physically. I have a really strong habit of exercising. Exercise is something I look forward to since it is so healthy for me.

I make sure I get adequate rest every night. I feel rested and ready to tackle the day. I keep a consistent bedtime and wake-up time.

My health and financial well-being go hand in hand. Each month brings with it a rise in my net worth and income. I save frequently and prevent excessive spending. I pay close attention to my money. I’m seeking for fresh approaches to increase my financial fortune.

I am wealthy and in good health.

I am concentrating on my health today. I am exercising, eating sensibly, and getting adequate rest.

Additionally, I’m keeping an eye on my money activity. I am increasing my income and making prudent use of my financial resources. I have wealth and good health.

Asking Oneself Questions

  1. What can I do every day to improve my health?
  2. How can I improve my financial situation? What can I do to manage my money better?
  3. If I had better health and wealth, what could I accomplish?

Stay with our blog and more and more people shares their ideas to live well.

Posted on

Service Coordination Role in New York State

Service coordination must be provided to all children that needs it.

Service coordination must be provided to all children referred to an Early Intervention Official as suspected of having a disability. Since infants and toddlers with disabilities require a comprehensive array of services that may be provided by multiple agencies or individuals, federal and state laws require the provision of a service coordinator who is responsible for ensuring communication, collaboration, and coordination among providers of service to eligible children and their families. Early intervention service coordination combines the traditional case management activities of organizing and coordinating needed services with the philosophy of family centered care.

 Goal of service coordination

 A major goal of service coordination is to create opportunities for the provision of collaborative, family-centered, community-based services for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families. Service coordinators help families identify and prioritize concerns, assist parents in developing of plans and strategies to meet the needs of their children and family units, and strengthen families’ competencies and sense of control over life events. What is service coordination and who provides it? Service coordination is defined in regulation as “assistance and services provided by a service coordinator to enable an eligible child and the child’s family to receive the rights, procedural safeguards, and services that are authorized under the Early Intervention Program” (10 NYCRR 69-4.1[k][2][xi]). 1 Service coordination services are provided by qualified personnel who are approved to provide service coordination services by the Department or other state early intervention service agency (10 NYCRR 69-4.5[a]). Service coordinators may be an employee of the municipality or under contract with the municipality. 

2 types of service coordinators

Service coordination services are provided by two types of service coordinators under the Early Intervention Program: initial service coordinators and ongoing service coordinators.

  1.  What is an initial service coordinator? The initial service coordinator is defined in regulation as “the service coordinator designated by the early intervention official upon receipt of a referral of a child thought to be eligible for early intervention services, who functions as the service coordinator who participates in the formulation of the Individualized Family Service Plan” (10 NYCRR 69- 4.1[y]). Section 2543 of Public Health Law (PHL) requires the early intervention official to promptly designate an initial service coordinator upon the referral of a child thought to be an eligible child. When appropriate, the early intervention official must select a service coordinator who has an established relationship with the child or family to serve as the initial service coordinator. For example, it may be appropriate for the early intervention official to designate a qualified staff member of a hospital approved to be the initial service coordinator for a family whose infant has been in a neonatal intensive care unit for an extended period of time and has an established relationship with that staff member. 2. 
  2. What is an ongoing service coordinator? The ongoing service coordinator is defined in regulation as “the service coordinator designated in the individualized family service plan” (10 NYCRR 69-4.1[af]). Section 2545(2)(i) of the PHL requires that the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) developed for an eligible child must include the name of the service coordinator selected by the parent who will be responsible for the implementation of the IFSP and coordination of agencies and persons responsible for delivery of the services contained within the IFSP. What qualifications are required to be an approved provider of service coordination services? 

There are two types of approved providers of service coordination under the Early Intervention Program: 

1. Incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and state-operated facilities that are approved by the Department of Health or other state early intervention service agency to deliver service coordination services. 

 2. Individual service coordinators approved by the Department of Health. 2 Only qualified personnel with appropriate licensure, certification, or registration are eligible to be approved by the Department of Health as an individual service coordinator. Approval requirements for providers of service coordination services are attached (10 NYCRR 69-4.7). 

All early intervention service coordinators, whether individual service coordinators or employees of an approved provider of service coordination services, are required to have all of the following qualifications (10 NYCRR 69-4.4). ƒ A minimum of one of the following educational or service coordination experience credentials:

• Two years experience in service coordination activities as delineated in regulation (voluntary or part-time experience which can be verified will be accepted on a pro rata basis); or, • One year of service coordination experience and an additional year of experience in a service setting with infants and toddlers with developmental delays or disabilities; or, • One year of service coordination experience and an Associates degree in a health or human service field; or

• A bachelor’s degree in a health or human service field. ƒ Demonstrated knowledge and understanding in the following areas:

•  Infants and toddlers who are eligible for early intervention services;

• State and federal laws and regulations pertaining to the Early Intervention Program;

• Principles of family centered services;

• The nature and scope of services available under the Early Intervention Program and the system of payments for services in the State; and,

• Other pertinent information. These qualifications enable approved providers of service coordination services to employ service coordinators with appropriate education and/or experience who are not otherwise considered “qualified personnel” (as defined at 10 NYCRR 69-4.1[aj]) under the Early Intervention Program.

This enables the participation of paraprofessionals with a diversity of cultural and experiential backgrounds, and who have unique connections to the community, to participate as service coordinators within a supervised employment setting. In addition, it provides for the employment of parents of children with disabilities who may lack certain professional qualifications but who bring a breadth of experience with families and service systems to the job. This capacity for flexibility in hiring service coordinators is particularly important in meeting one of the program’s statutory goals, i.e., meeting the needs of historically underrepresented populations. Are approved service coordinators required to participate in in-service training? 

Approved providers of service coordination services

Approved providers of service coordination services must participate in the introductory service coordination training session sponsored or approved by the Department of Health in the first three months and by no later than one year of direct or contractual 3 employment as an early intervention service coordinator, provided that training sessions are offered and accessible in locations with reasonable proximity to their place of employment at least three times annually (10 NYCRR 69-4.4[b]). Approved providers of service coordination services are also required to furnish assurances of their participation in in-service training pursuant to a plan developed by the Department of Health (10 NYCRR 69-4.5[a][4][viii]). The Department of Health will establish a comprehensive, statewide training program, which will provide for ongoing training for service coordinators. What responsibilities are unique to the initial service coordinator? The initial service coordinator is frequently the first representative of the public agency responsible for the program with whom the parent interacts subsequent to a referral of their child to the early intervention official. The initial service coordinator has primary responsibility for ensuring that parents are informed about the Early Intervention Program and their rights under the program; securing the essential information and consent from parents necessary for participation in early intervention services; and assisting parents in selecting an evaluator and obtaining a screening and/or multidisciplinary evaluation for their child. 

The specific responsibilities are described in regulation 

The specific responsibilities are described in regulation (10 NYCRR 69-4.7). These include: ƒ Arranging promptly a first contact with the parent(s) in a time, place, and manner reasonably convenient for the parent(s), within a timeframe consistent with the requirement to convene the IFSP meeting within 45 days of a referral. During these first contacts, the parent(s) may identify family priorities, concerns, and resources. With parental consent, the initial service coordinator should share this information with the evaluator to provide input into the family-directed assessment of the parent’s priorities, concerns, and resources as related to the development of the child.

ƒ Obtaining basic information necessary to enroll the child and family in the program. ƒ Ensuring that the parent has received The Early Intervention Program: A Parent’s Guide, the parent’s handbook that provides information about the program. Initial service coordinators are responsible for providing parents with an overview of the early intervention system and services, and the role of service coordinators; reviewing The Early Intervention Program: A Parent’s Guide to ensure parents understand the information contained within the book; and, reviewing parents’ rights under the Early Intervention Program (10NYCRR 69-4.7[c][1]). ƒ Explaining and discussing with the parent the potential benefits of early intervention services to the child and family, including the availability and benefits of parent support groups. ƒ Ascertaining whether the child and family are presently receiving case management 4 services or other services from public or private agencies. When families are engaged in other case management services, the service coordinator must discuss options for collaboration with other case managers working with the family and obtain consent for the release of information to facilitate such collaboration (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[d]). ƒ Assisting parents in meeting basic needs and/or immediate priorities other than early intervention services for the child and family (e.g., housing, food, and primary health care). 

The initial service coordinator may assist the parent to identify appropriate formal and informal resources to aid the family in meeting their immediate needs while proceeding with plans for evaluation and IFSP development. ƒ Coordinating all aspects of the screening and evaluation process to determine a child’s eligibility for the Early Intervention Program. The initial service coordinator is responsible for:

• Reviewing with parents the options for approved evaluators to perform their child’s screening and/or evaluation from the list of approved providers supplied to early intervention officials by the Department (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[j]).

• Discussing pertinent information about potential evaluators with parents, including their location, types of evaluations performed, and settings for evaluations (e.g., home vs. evaluation agency). Initial service coordinators are also responsible for discussing with parents any needs they might have in accessing an evaluation for their children and arranging or assisting the parent to arrange for the child’s multidisciplinary evaluation (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[k]). ƒ Discussing the IFSP process with the parents of children determined to be eligible for early intervention services (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[o]). Service coordinators are required to inform parents:

• Of the required participants in the IFSP meeting, and the parent’s option to invite other parties;

• That the initial service coordinator may invite other participants provided that the service coordinator explains the purpose of others’ participation and obtains the parent’s consent;

• That inclusion of family assessment information is optional;

• That the family’s priorities, concerns, and resources will play a major role in the establishment of outcomes and strategies among the parent, evaluator, service coordinator, and early intervention official; • Of the opportunity to select an ongoing service coordinator, who may be different from the initial service coordinator, at the IFSP meeting or at any other time after the formulation of the IFSP; and,

• That the final decisions about the services to be provided to the child will be made by the parent and the early intervention official; and

• That services can be delivered in a range of settings such as an approved provider’s facility, as well as a variety of natural environments, including the child’s home, childcare site or other community settings. ƒ Participating in the meeting to develop the IFSP. The initial service coordinator is a required participant in the meeting to develop the initial IFSP.

The early intervention 5 official is required to convene a meeting to develop the IFSP within 45 days of the receipt of a referral, except under exceptional circumstances (such as the illness of the child or parent) or at the parent’s request. The initial service coordinator must document in the child’s record reasons for extension of the 45 day time period for the development of the IFSP (PHL §2545, 10 NYCRR 69-4.11[a][1]). ƒ Informing parents of their option and providing them with the opportunity to select an ongoing service coordinator, who may be different from the initial service coordinator, to be responsible for ongoing provision of service coordination and ensuring the implementation of the IFSP (PHL §2545). Parents must also be informed of their option to request a change in their service coordinator at any time in the future. ƒ The initial service coordinator is responsible for facilitating the transmission of information concerning the child and family, including the IFSP document, to the ongoing service coordinator selected by the parent at or subsequent to the IFSP meeting (if applicable) and to service providers identified in the IFSP. Are the initial and ongoing service coordinators responsible for informing parents about the use of Medicaid and other third party insurance under the Early Intervention Program? Yes. Initial and ongoing service coordinators are responsible for informing parents that Medicaid and private insurance are required sources of payment for services provided under the Early Intervention Program.

The initial and ongoing service coordinator 

The initial and ongoing service coordinator should inform the parent that it is impermissible for accident and health insurance policies and contracts, delivered and effectuated in New York State, to provide that payment for early intervention services will be applied against any maximum annual or lifetime limits (Insurance Law §3231, PHL §2559[3][c]). Parents must also be informed that the municipality is responsible for any co-payments and deductibles when insurance is billed for early intervention services. The municipality cannot obtain payment from an insurer if the insurer is not prohibited from and will apply payment for early intervention services to the annual and lifetime limits specified in their insurance policy (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[g] and [h]). The Department has supplied all early intervention officials with a list of third party insurers governed by the State and has developed an Early Intervention Memorandum regarding third party insurance reimbursement for early intervention services. See 10 NYCRR 69-4.22 and the guidance memorandum on the use of private insurance for reimbursement of early intervention services that was provided by the Department of Health reissued January 2000. (Copies may be obtained from the New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Early Intervention, 287 Corning Tower Building, ESP, Albany, New York 12237.) 

Are the initial and ongoing service coordinators responsible for obtaining information about the status of the family’s third party insurance? Yes. Initial and ongoing service coordinators are required to obtain, and parents are required to provide, information about the family’s third party insurance coverage, including Medicaid status and/or private health insurance (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[h]). Initial and ongoing service coordinators are further required to promptly notify the early intervention official of the family’s insurance coverage. Specifically, the initial service coordinator is required in regulation 10 NYCRR 69-4.7(h) to provide the early intervention official with the following information pertaining to the family’s insurance coverage: 6 ƒ Medicaid enrollment status and identification number, if any; ƒ Type of other health insurance policy or health benefits plan, name of insurer or plan administrator, and policy or plan identification number; ƒ Type of coverage extended to the family by the policy; and, ƒ Any additional information necessary for reimbursement by Medicaid or other third party insurance for early intervention services. What happens if a parent has no third party insurance? Eligible children and their families under the Early Intervention Program are entitled to receive appropriate early intervention services at no cost to the family, regardless of third party insurance coverage. Third party payments are, however, important sources of revenue for the Early Intervention Program, to ensure the continued viability of the program. Initial service coordinators are also required to assist parents of potentially eligible and eligible children in identifying and applying for benefit programs for which the family may be eligible (10 NYCRR 69-4.7 [i]). These programs include: ƒ The Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid); ƒ Supplemental Social Security Income Program; ƒ Physically Handicapped Children’s Program; ƒ Child Health Plus; and, ƒ Social Security Disability Income. 

What are the responsibilities of the initial service coordinator for a child who is found to be ineligible for the Early Intervention Program? Initial service coordination must be provided and is a billable service for any child thought to be eligible for early intervention services and referred to the early intervention official. Inevitably, some children who are referred for early intervention services will be determined to be ineligible for the program. The responsibilities of the initial service coordinator for a child determined by an approved evaluator to be ineligible for early intervention services and the child’s family are described in regulation (10 NYCRR 69-4.7[n]) and include: ƒ Informing the parent of the right to due process procedures (described in regulation at 10 NYCRR 69-4.17(f)), including the right to mediation and an impartial hearing to contest the evaluator’s eligibility determination; ƒ Informing the parent of other services which the parent may choose to access and for which the child may be eligible and offer assistance with appropriate referrals. 

What responsibilities are common to both initial and ongoing service coordinators? All initial and ongoing service coordinators whether direct municipal employees or under contract with the municipality, must provide service coordination services consistent with the standards delineated in program regulations (10 NYCRR 69-4.6). Regulations (10 NYCRR 69-4.6[a][1]) require that every eligible infant and toddler be provided with one service coordinator who is responsible for coordinating all services across agency lines and serving as the primary point of contact in helping parents to obtain the services and/or 7 assistance they need. 

The service coordination process is described in regulation (10 NYCRR 69-4.6[b]) as an active process that involves: ƒ Assisting parents of eligible infants and toddlers in gaining access to the early intervention services and other services identified in the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP); ƒ Ensuring the IFSP outcomes and strategies reflect the family’s priorities, concerns and resources, and that changes are made as the family’s priorities, concerns and resources change; ƒ Coordinating the provision of early intervention services and other services (such as medical services for other than diagnostic and evaluation purposes) that the infant or toddler needs or is receiving; ƒ Facilitating the timely delivery of available services; and, ƒ Continuously seeking the appropriate services and situations necessary to benefit the development of the child for the duration of the child’s eligibility. The specific activities required of initial and ongoing service coordinators are defined in regulation (10 NYCRR 69-4.6[c]) as including: ƒ Coordinating the performance of evaluations and assessments: Initial service coordinators are responsible for assisting parents in all aspects of arranging and obtaining a screening and/or multidisciplinary evaluation to determine a child’s eligibility for the program. Ongoing service coordinators are responsible for arranging or assisting parents to arrange additional evaluations and assessments of the child and voluntary family assessments when additional evaluations are necessary to complete the required six-month reviews and annual evaluations of the IFSP or as otherwise needed. ƒ Facilitating and participating in the development, review and evaluation of IFSPs: The initial service coordinator facilitates and ensures the development of the initial IFSP. The ongoing service coordinator is responsible for implementation of the IFSP and facilitating any necessary changes to the IFSP (10NYCRR 69-4.11[a][10][xii]). The ongoing service coordinator is also responsible for arranging and facilitating the required six-month reviews and annual evaluations of the IFSPs. ƒ Assisting families in identifying service providers: In preparation for the IFSP meeting, the service coordinator assists the parent in identifying appropriate service providers. Initial and ongoing service coordinators should be knowledgeable about the approved evaluators, service coordinators, and providers within their municipality and, as appropriate, within adjacent municipalities. 

Service coordinators should be knowledgeable about the service models offered by different approved providers, the types of qualified personnel employed by various providers, languages spoken by staff and the extent to which service providers offer culturally consonant services for diverse populations. ƒ Informing families of the availability of advocacy services: Initial and ongoing service coordinators are responsible for ensuring that parents are informed about advocacy services to facilitate their participation in the Early Intervention Program. Such information is particularly important for parents when a dispute about their child’s eligibility or services arises and the pursuit of mediation or an impartial hearing procedure is being considered by the parent. All parents should be informed of their right to have an advocate accompany them to their child’s evaluation and meetings pertaining to the IFSP. 8 ƒ Coordinating with medical and health care providers: Initial and ongoing service coordinators are responsible for facilitating any necessary collaboration between early intervention service providers and medical and health care providers providing services to the child and/or family. Service coordinators should ascertain whether the child and family are engaged with a primary health care provider, and refer for primary health care as appropriate. With parental consent, the service coordinator may maintain communication with health care providers by providing information about the child’s participation in the program and relevant documentation. Initial and ongoing service coordinators may, with parental consent, obtain medical information from the child’s primary care and/or specialty physicians when the information is relevant for the provision of services in the IFSP. 

Service coordinators have primary responsibility for ensuring that parents are provided with ongoing information concerning the procedural safeguards afforded to them under law (PHL §2549) and regulation (NYCRR 69-4.17) and how to access due process procedures when necessary. Service coordinators should ensure that families are informed of, and, to the extent possible, understand: ƒ The voluntary nature of the Early Intervention Program; ƒ Their right to select an approved evaluator and that their decision to access a multidisciplinary evaluation for their child does not obligate them to further participation in the program; ƒ The right to request a second evaluation or component of the evaluation from the early intervention official upon a determination by the evaluator of ineligibility for services; ƒ The right to access mediation and impartial hearing procedures in the event of a dispute with the early intervention official over their child’s eligibility or any aspect of the IFSP; ƒ The right to confidentiality of all information pertaining to their child and family and requirements for parental consent for release of information; ƒ The responsibility of the early intervention official to ensure that parents receive all information in their dominant language or other mode of communication used by the parent, including Braille, sign language or oral communication, unless clearly not feasible to do so. What responsibilities are unique to the ongoing service coordinator? The ongoing service coordinator is responsible for monitoring the delivery of early intervention services in accordance with the IFSP. Ongoing service coordinators provide parents with continuing opportunities to share information, priorities, and concerns regarding their IFSP.

A variety of methods are available to the ongoing service coordinator for providing such opportunities to families and monitoring and coordinating the provision of services in the IFSP, including home visits, telephone contacts with the parent, other caregiver, and service providers, and meetings with the parent and service providers to foster and support collaboration and integration of service strategies. The ongoing service coordinator is responsible for facilitating the child’s transition to preschool special education services and/or other programs and services needed by the child and family as the child ages out of the Early Intervention Program, including the development of a transition plan. The service coordinator is responsible for the following activities in regulation at NYCRR 69-4.20: 9 ƒ Reviewing information concerning the transition procedure with the parent and obtaining parental consent for the transfer of appropriate evaluations, assessments, Individualized Family Service Plans, and other pertinent records. ƒ Assisting the parent(s) in development of a transition plan to other appropriate early childhood and supportive services, when the child is thought not to be eligible for preschool special education services under Section 4410 of the Education Law. 

Facilitating the development of a transition plan which describes procedures to prepare the child and family for changes in service delivery, including: 

• Steps to help the child adjust to and function in a new setting; and,

 • Procedures to prepare program staff or individual qualified personnel who will be providing services to the child to facilitate a smooth transition; 

 • With parental consent, the service coordinator is responsible for incorporating the transition plan into the Individualized Family Service Plan.

 The early intervention official is required to provide written notification to the Committee on Preschool Special Education of the school district in which the child resides at least 120 days prior to a child’s potential transition to preschool special education services under Section 4410 of the Education Law and, with parental consent, convene a conference to develop a transition plan. See 10 NYCRR 69-4.20 and guidance on transition that was provided by the Department of Health and State Education Department in a joint memorandum from the two agencies issued February 1994. (Copies may be obtained from the New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Early Intervention, 287 Corning Tower Building, ESP, Albany, New York 12237-0618.) How can the need for ongoing service coordination be estimated? The number of hours per month of service coordination included in the IFSP should be individually specified for each eligible child and their family based on the estimated time that will be needed by the service coordinator to perform the functions discussed above. More service coordination time than average may be indicated for families: ƒ Involved with multiple service providers and agencies; ƒ Whose child or other family member has complex medical and health needs; ƒ Experiencing environmental and social stresses; and, ƒ Whose other life circumstances may lead to the need for additional service coordination support. As a guideline, ongoing service coordinators should plan for an average of about one hour of total (contact and non-contact) time per week per family. Additional service coordination time may be needed for particular service events, such as six-month reviews and annual evaluations and transitions of children from the Early Intervention Program to other service systems

 Service coordination services are not a substitute for other appropriate early intervention services which may be needed by the child and/or family, including social work services, 10 counseling, or psychological services (defined in regulation at 10 NYCRR 69-4.1[k]). Appropriate referrals and requests for amending the IFSP should be made as needed. How should service coordination services be coordinated with case management services provided outside of the Early Intervention Program? For children served by Medicaid, early intervention service coordination is a form of Comprehensive Medicaid Case Management Services (CMCM). Some children and their families referred to the early intervention official will be enrolled in and receiving Comprehensive Medicaid Case Management Services at the time the early intervention official designates an initial service coordinator. In such instances, parents need to be informed that only one service coordinator/case manager is reimbursable under Medicaid. The CMCM provider and the early intervention official must contact the local social services district CMCM program to disenroll the child from CMCM and enroll the child in early intervention service coordination services. If the CMCM provider engaged with the family at the time of the referral is an approved provider of early intervention service coordination services, the initial service coordinator designated by the municipality must discuss with the parent the option of receiving service coordination services from their CMCM provider. In such instances, the CMCM provider can be selected as the ongoing service coordinator and bill the municipality for early intervention service coordination services provided to the family at prices set by the Department. For children participating in a Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Waiver Program or the Care-At-Home Program at the time of a referral to the early intervention official, the initial service coordinator must inform the parents that the waiver case manager must serve as the ongoing service coordinator for purposes of the Early Intervention Program. 

The parent must be informed that in this case seeking other service coordination services could result in the loss of the child’s Medicaid eligibility. In these situations, the waiver case manager/service coordinator bills Medicaid Management Information Services (MMIS) directly for case management/service coordination services and may not bill the municipality for service coordination services. What is a billable service coordination service? Contacts for service coordination services do not need to be direct contacts with the family to be billable events. For example, billable activities include face-to-face and telephone contacts with caregivers, childcare providers, and service providers as necessary to fulfill and monitor the child’s IFSP. Activities which are indirectly related to the planning or implementation of a child’s IFSP, such as case recording, travel, training and conferences, supervisory conferences, team meetings and administrative responsibilities, are not separately billable service coordination events. These activities have been factored into the Department’s reimbursement rate for service coordination services. Service coordinators must maintain appropriate documentation concerning the IFSP process, receipt of the services contained in the IFSP, and six-month and annual reviews of the IFSP. Contacts with parents, evaluators, and service providers should be documented and included in the child’s record. What about caseloads? 11 Early intervention service coordination is a service for which there was no direct analog in the prior family court order system. 

Service coordinators have wide-ranging responsibilities for assisting and facilitating families in negotiating all aspects of the Early Intervention Program. Service coordinators are also responsible for assisting families in accessing other services and negotiating other service systems, which may be of benefit to them. Because the service coordinator role is intended to be flexible and tailored to meet individual family needs, resources, and priorities, families will be accessing differing intensities of service coordination services. This will appropriately result in variations in service coordinator caseloads. For example, an economically stable family with a strong support network who has a toddler with a delay in speech development and whose current health and developmental status is otherwise normal may have less need for service coordination than an impoverished, socially isolated family whose child has special medical needs in addition to a disability. The Department anticipates a range in caseloads from 25 to 60 families per one full time equivalent service coordinator, with an average caseload of about 35 families. When determining an appropriate caseload, early intervention officials and providers of service coordination services should consider a variety of factors, including the mix of families new to the program or transitioning from the program with families who are not in a transitional phase of service delivery, plus community and life circumstances of families which may dictate a lesser or greater need for services. In determining appropriate caseloads, recognition should also be given to the unique developmental needs of infants and toddlers and the ensuing parenting needs and strengths of their families. Finally, service coordinators must receive sufficient oversight and supervision to ensure that each service coordinator has the necessary guidance to provide the service coordination activities listed in the program regulations. The Department anticipates that caseload guidelines will be refined with additional Early Intervention Program implementation experience. In addition, the effective implementation of early intervention service coordination will be an important target of the Department’s quality assurance efforts. For further information and assistance, please contact the Department of Health, Bureau of Early Intervention, Room 287, Corning Tower Building, Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12237-0618, (518) 473-7016. Attachment – Regulations relating to service coordination: 10 NYCRR 69-4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7. 12 Attachment A – 10 NYCRR § 69-4.4 New York State Early Intervention Program Regulations Sec. 69-4.4 

Qualifications of Service Coordinators (a) All early intervention service coordinators shall meet the following qualifications: 

  1. (1) a minimum of one of the following educational or service coordination experience credentials: (i) two years experience in service coordination activities as delineated in this subpart (voluntary or parttime experience which can be verified will be accepted on a pro rata basis); or (ii) one year of service coordination experience and an additional year of experience in a service setting with infants and toddlers with developmental delays or disabilities; or (iii) one year of service coordination experience and an Associates degree in a health or human service field; or (iv) a Bachelor’s degree in a health or human service field. 
  2. (2) demonstrated knowledge and understanding in the following areas: 

(i) infants and toddlers who may be eligible for early intervention services; (ii) state and federal laws and regulations pertaining to the Early Intervention Program; (iii) principles of family centered services; (iv) the nature and scope of services available under the Early Intervention Program and the system of payments for services in the State; and (v) other pertinent information. (b) Service coordinators shall participate in the introductory service coordination training session sponsored or approved by the Department of Health in the first three months and by no later than one year of direct or contractual employment as an early intervention service coordinator, provided that training sessions are offered and accessible in locations with reasonable proximity to their place of employment at least three times annually. 

  • (1) Employees of incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and State operated facilities approved to deliver service coordination services must submit documentation of participation in the introductory service coordination training to their employers for retention in their personnel record. 
  • (2) Individual service coordinators must submit documentation of their participation in introductory service coordination training to the Department of Health for retention with their approved application to deliver service coordination services. 
  • (3) Failure to participate in the introductory service coordination training sponsored or approved by the Department of Health may result in the disqualification as a provider of service coordination services in accordance with procedures set forth in Section 69-4.17(i). Sec. 69-4.5 

Approval of Service Coordinators, Evaluators, and Service Providers (a) Early intervention service coordinators, evaluators, and/or service providers shall be approved to deliver service coordination services, evaluations, and early intervention services as follows: 13

 (1) incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, partnerships, and state-operated facilities operating under the approval of any state early intervention service agency shall apply to such agency or to the Department of Health for approval to provide service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services, except that those entities which are currently approved by or otherwise affiliated with the Department of Social Services or Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services shall apply to the Department of Health for approval to provide service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services;

 (2) municipalities, incorporated entities, sole proprietorships, and partnerships not approved by any state early intervention service agency shall apply to the Department of Health for approval to provide service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services;

 (3) those entities and individuals seeking approval to provide early intervention service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services shall complete an approved Medicaid provider agreement and reassign Medicaid benefits to the municipality; 

(4) the state early intervention services agency or the Department of Health shall approve applicants, other than individuals, as providers of service coordination, evaluations, and/or early intervention services based on:

  1. (i) the character and competence of the service provider; 
  2. (ii) assurances of fiscal viability; 
  3. (iii) assurances of the capacity to provide service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services; 
  4. (iv) assurance of availability of qualified personnel; 
  5. (v) completion of an approved Medicaid provider agreement and reassignment of Medicaid benefits to the municipality; 
  6. (vi) assurances of adherence to applicable federal and state laws and regulations; (vii) assurances of the capacity to deliver services on a twelve-month basis and flexibility in the hours of service delivery, including weekend and evening hours; (viii) assurances of capacity and agreement that qualified personnel will participate in inservice training pursuant to a plan developed by the Department of Health; 
  7. (ix) assurances of compliance with the confidentiality requirements set forth in Section 69-4.17(c) of this subpart; (x) provision of copies of all organizational documents, such as partnership agreements or certificates of incorporation; and 
  8. (xi) such additional pertinent information or documents necessary for the Agency’s approval, as requested. 

(5) Individual service coordinators, evaluators, and service providers shall be approved by the Department of Health to provide early intervention service coordination services, supplemental evaluations, and/or early intervention services. 

Qualified individuals with appropriate licensure, certification, or registration shall apply to the Department of Health for approval to provide service coordination services, supplemental evaluations, and/or early intervention services. The Department of Health shall approve individuals to deliver early intervention service coordination services, supplemental evaluations, and/or early intervention services based on the following factors: 

  1. (i) the character and competence of the individual; 
  2. (ii) assurances of the capacity to provide service coordination, supplemental evaluations, and/or early intervention services; 
  3. (iii) qualifications as specified in this subpart; 14 
  4. (iv) completion of an approved Medicaid provider agreement and reassignment of Medicaid benefits to the municipality; 
  5. (v) assurances of adherence to applicable federal and state laws and regulations;
  6. (vi) current licensure, certification, or registration in a discipline designated by the Commissioner as qualified personnel;
  7. (vii) assurances to notify the Department of Health within two working days of suspension, expiration, or revocation of licensure, certification, or registration; 
  8. (viii) assurances of the capacity to deliver services on a twelve-month basis and flexibility in the hours of service delivery, including weekend and evening hours; 
  9. (ix) assurances of capacity and agreement to attend in-service training programs pursuant to a plan developed by the Department of Health; 
  10. (x) assurances of compliance with the confidentiality requirements set forth in Section 69-4.17(c) of this Subpart; and 
  11. (xi) such additional pertinent information or documents necessary for the Agency’s consideration, as requested. (b) All applicants shall receive written notice of their approval to deliver service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services from the Department of Health, State Education Department, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities or Office of Mental Health. 

(1) The notice shall inform the applicant that a contract with the municipality is necessary to be reimbursed for service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services and to be included on the list of approved evaluators, service coordinators, and/or service providers. 

(2) The early intervention officials for municipalities in the catchment areas in which the applicant proposes to deliver service coordination services, evaluations, and/or early intervention services, shall receive written notice of the applicant’s approval from the state agency approving the application. (c) The municipality, upon entering into a contract with the approved provider of service coordination services, evaluations and/or early intervention services, shall notify the Department of Health within 10 working days of the finalization of the contract. The notification shall include the time period for which the contract is valid. (d) The State Education Department, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, or Office of Mental Health shall notify the Department of Health of their approval of any applicant as a provider of service coordination services, evaluations and/or early intervention services within five working days. (e) Approved service coordinators, evaluators and/or service providers shall notify, in writing, the state early intervention service agency which granted his or her approval, if such service coordinator, evaluator and/or service provider wishes to modify the catchment area, the target population or the qualified personnel available to deliver services. (f) The State Education Department, Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, or Office of Mental Health shall notify the Department of Health of any modifications in the catchment area, the target population or the qualified personnel available to deliver services submitted to such agency by an approved service coordinator, evaluator or service provider within five working days of notification. (g) An approved service coordinator, evaluator and/or service provider who intends to cease providing service coordination services, evaluations or early intervention services, or in the case of an agency, intends to cease ownership, possession or operation of the agency, or chooses to voluntarily terminate status as an approved service coordination, evaluation and/or service provider agency, shall submit to the Commissioner and early intervention official written notice of such intention not less than 90 days prior to the intended effective date of such action. 15 Sec. 69-4.6 

Standards for Initial and Ongoing Service Coordinators

(a) All individuals approved to provide early intervention service coordination shall fulfill those functions and activities necessary to assist and enable an eligible infant and toddler and parent to receive the rights, procedural safeguards and services that are authorized to be provided under State and federal law, including other services not required under the Early Intervention Program, but for which the family may be eligible. (1) Each eligible infant and toddler and their family shall be provided with one service coordinator who shall be responsible for: (i) coordinating all services across agency lines; and (ii) serving as the single point of contact in helping parents to obtain the services and/or assistance they need. (b) Service coordination shall be an active ongoing process that involves: 

  1. (1) assisting parents of eligible infants and toddlers in gaining access to the early intervention services and other services identified in the Individualized Family Service Plan; 
  2. (2) ensuring the Individualized Family Service Plan outcomes and strategies reflect the family’s priorities, concerns and resources, and that changes are made as the family’s priorities concerns and resources change; 
  3. (3) coordinating the provision of early intervention services and other services (such as medical services for other than diagnostic and evaluation purposes) that the infant or toddler needs or is receiving; 
  4. (4) facilitating the timely delivery of available services; and 
  5. (5) continuously seeking the appropriate services and situations necessary to benefit the development of the child for the duration of the child’s eligibility. 

(c) Specific service coordination activities shall include: 

  1. (1) coordinating the performance of evaluations and assessments; 
  2. (2) facilitating and participating in the development, review and evaluation of Individualized Family Service Plans; 
  3. (3) assisting families in identifying available service providers; 
  4. (4) coordinating and monitoring the delivery of services; 
  5. (5) informing families of the availability of advocacy services; 
  6. (6) coordinating with medical and health care providers, including a referral to appropriate primary health care providers as needed; and 
  7. (7) facilitating the development of a transition plan to preschool services if appropriate or to other available supports and services. 69-4.7 Initial Service Coordinators 

(a) Upon referral to the early intervention official of a child thought to be an eligible child, the early intervention official shall promptly designate an initial service coordinator, selecting whenever appropriate a service coordinator who has an established relationship with the child or family and shall promptly notify the parent of such designation in writing. (1) Upon receipt of the referral, the early intervention official shall make reasonable efforts to promptly forward a copy of the Early Intervention Program parents’ handbook to the parent by mail or other suitable means. 16 (2) 

For children in the care and custody or custody and guardianship of the local social services commissioner, the early intervention official shall notify the local commissioner of social services or designee of the designation of an initial service coordinator. (b) The initial service coordinator shall promptly arrange a contact with the parent in a time, place and manner reasonably convenient for the parent and consistent with applicable timeliness requirements. (c) The initial service coordinator shall inform the parent of their rights and entitlement under the Early Intervention Program and shall document the information provided in the child’s record. (1) At the initial contact with the parent, the initial service coordinator shall ensure the parent has a copy of the Early Intervention Program parents’ handbook, review the handbook, provide an overview of the early intervention system and services, discuss the role of the initial service coordinator, and review the parent’s rights, responsibilities and entitlements under the program. (d) The initial service coordinator shall ascertain if the child and family are presently receiving case management services or other services from public or private agencies. If so, the initial service coordinator shall discuss options for collaboration with the parent and, if appropriate, obtain consent for the release of information for the purpose of collaboration with other case management services. (e) All information provided to the parent shall be in the parent’s dominant language or other mode of communication unless clearly not feasible to do so. (f) All information obtained from the parent shall be confidential and may only be disclosed upon written consent, unless otherwise required or permitted to be disclosed by law. (g) The initial service coordinator shall inform the family that services must be at no cost to parents and use of Medicaid and/or third-party insurance for payment of services is required under the Early Intervention Program. 

  1. (1) The service coordinator shall inform the parent that any deductible or co-payments will be paid by the municipality. 
  2. (2) The service coordinator shall inform the parent that use of third-party insurance for payment of early intervention services will not be applied against lifetime or annual limits specified in their insurance policy, if such policy is subject to New York State law and regulation. 
  3. (3) The service coordinator shall inform the parent that the municipality will not obtain payment from their insurer if the insurer is not prohibited from applying, and will apply, payment for early intervention services to the annual and lifetime limits specified in their insurance policy. (h) 

The initial service coordinator must obtain, and parents must provide, information about the status of the family’s third party insurance coverage and Medicaid status and promptly notify the early intervention official of such status, including: 

  1. (1) Medicaid enrollment status and identification number, if any; 
  2. (2) type of health insurance policy or health benefits plan, name of insurer or plan administrator, and policy or plan identification number; 
  3. (3) type of coverage extended to the family by the policy; and 
  4. (4) such additional information necessary for reimbursement. 
  5. (i) The service coordinator shall assist the parent in identifying and applying for benefit programs for which the family may be eligible, including: 
  6. (1) the Medical Assistance Program; 
  7. (2) Supplemental Social Security Income Program; 17 
  8. (3) Physically Handicapped Children’s Program; 
  9. (4) Child Health Plus; and (5) Social Security Disability Income. 

(j) The initial service coordinator shall review all options for evaluation and screening with the parent from the list of approved evaluators including location, types of evaluations performed, and settings for evaluations (e.g., home vs. evaluation agency). Upon selection of an evaluator by the parent, the initial service coordinator shall ascertain from the parent any needs the parent may have in accessing the evaluation. (k) The initial service coordinator shall at the parent’s request assist the parent in arrangement of the evaluation after the parent selects from the list of approved evaluators. (l) If the parent has accessed an approved evaluator prior to contact by the initial service coordinator, the initial service coordinator shall contact the parent to assure that the parent has received information concerning alternative approved evaluators and ascertain from the parent any needs the parent may have in accessing the evaluation. 

(m) Upon receipt of the results of the evaluation, the initial service coordinator may with the approval of the early intervention official and with parental consent, require additional diagnostic information regarding the condition of the child, provided that such information is not unnecessarily duplicative or invasive to the child according to guidelines of the Department of Health.

  1. (1) Prior to obtaining written consent for additional diagnostic information, the initial service coordinator shall provide the parent with a written explanation which shall include: (i) diagnostic information requested; (ii) reasons for obtaining the information, and use of the information; (iii) location of diagnostic testing; (iv) source of payment and that no costs shall be incurred by the parent; (v) a statement that the information shall not be used to refute eligibility; and (vi) a statement that the meeting to formulate the Individualized Family Service Plan shall be held within the 45 day time limit. 
  2. (2) The initial service coordinator shall assist the parent in accessing the diagnostic testing as needed and desired by the parent. 
  3. (3) The initial service coordinator shall facilitate the parent understanding of the results of the diagnostic information, and with parent consent, incorporate this diagnostic information into the planning and formulation of the Individualized Family Service Plan. 

(n) Upon the determination of a child as ineligible for early intervention services, the initial service coordinator shall inform the parent of the right to due process procedures as set forth in this Subpart. (1) The initial service coordinator shall inform the parent of other services which the parent may choose to access and for which the child may be eligible and offer assistance with appropriate referrals. (o) Upon determination of the child’s eligibility for the early intervention program, the initial service coordinator shall discuss the Individualized Family Service Plan process with the parent and shall inform the parent: 

  1. (1) of the required participants in the Individualized Family Service Plan meeting and the parent’s option to invite other parties; 18 
  2. (2) that the initial service coordinator may invite other participants, provided that the service coordinator obtains the parent’s consent and explains the purpose of this person’s participation; 
  3. (3) that inclusion of family assessment information is optional; 
  4. (4) that their priorities, concerns and resources shall play a major role in the establishment of outcomes and strategies among the parent, evaluator, service coordinator and early intervention official; 
  5. (5) of the opportunity to select an ongoing service coordinator, who may be different from the initial service coordinator, at the Individualized Family Service Plan meeting or at any other time after the formulation of the Individualized Family Service Plan; 
  6. (6) that the final decisions about the services to be provided to the child will be made by the parent and the early intervention official; and 
  7. (7) that services can be delivered in a range of settings such as an approved provider’s facility, as well as a variety of natural environments, including the child’s home, child care site or other community settings. 

(p) The initial service coordinator shall assist the parent in preparing for the meeting to develop the Individualized Family Service Plan, including facilitating their understanding of the child’s multidisciplinary evaluation and identifying their resources, priorities, and concerns related to their child’s development. (1) The initial service coordinator shall discuss with the parent the options for early intervention services and facilitate the parent’s investigation of various options as requested by the parent

Posted on

Stretching Before Exercise Vs. Stretching After Exercise.

Have you made the decision not to stretch after your workout? 

After a difficult workout, it could be tempting to unwind on the couch. But your workout isn’t nearly over. A proper cool-down should include several sorts of stretching. Your muscles and joints may be acting up if you haven’t been stretching after working out. You might not be aware of the best stretches to do after working out. For guidance on how to stretch properly after working out, contact Rebound Physical The

What Encourages Stretching After Exercise?

Here are three reasons why it’s crucial to stretch after working out. Because stretching promotes blood flow, which has many advantageous benefits on your health, it improves heart function. It’s equally important to get your heart rate back to normal after your activity is finished. Correct stretching will help your heart rate return to normal in a healthy manner.

Stretching Lowers Lactic Acid – Lactic acid is produced by the body during exercise, which causes aching, sore muscles. Stretching can help to reduce the development of lactic acid throughout the body. It also relaxes tense muscles.

Stretching Lessens Stress on Joints and Muscles Stretching correctly helps lessen the stress on your muscles and joints. As a result, your muscles will continue to be toned and flexible. Ultimately, this will reduce the chance of damage following exercise.

Causes and Symptoms of Not Stretching

You might not feel the need to stretch if your muscles don’t hurt or feel sore after working out. To put it bluntly, you might not want to take the time to do it. However, neglecting the recommended stretching after exercise may have a number of drawbacks. You may feel stiff if you’re not stretching sufficiently. After exercise, improper stretching of muscles and tendons may increase the chance of injury. If you currently have an injury, you should change your stretching routine, according to the Mayo Clinic. In addition to making sure you stretch at all after working out, it’s critical to complete the right kinds of stretches.

Health Advantages of Physical Therapy

A physical therapist can teach you many methods for stretching more effectively. Move Forward claims that stretching is an essential part of post-exercise rehabilitation but that it frequently goes neglected or is given insufficient time. A physical therapy program created just for you can teach you the correct approach to stretch after exercise. Whether you play sports frequently or infrequently, a skilled physical therapist can teach you the best stretching techniques.

Stretching after exercise can help keep your muscles and joints healthy. Find a physical therapist who is certified and who can demonstrate various stretches. If you are having joint and muscle pain from insufficient stretching, seeing a physical therapist may also be helpful. You can learn stretches from a therapist that will improve your flexibility, reduce injuries, and perhaps even improve your athletic performance.

Posted on

Physical Therapist vs Physical Therapy Assistant Role

This article will discuss the limitation of practice of PT Assistant and PT Supervision.

When used in this section, the term “acceptable accrediting agency” refers to a group that the department has recognized as a trustworthy authority for the purpose of accrediting physical therapy programs, one that has accreditation standards that are roughly equivalent to the specifications for programs registered as leading to physical therapy licensure under section 52.43 of this Title, and one that applies its criteria for awarding program accreditation in a fair, consistent, and objective manner.
The applicant must provide proof of: in order to satisfy the professional education requirement for licensing in this State. a master’s or higher-level degree in physical therapy from a course of study registered with the department or certified by a reputable certifying body; or completion of a program that is acceptable to the department, substantially equivalent to a master’s degree program in physical therapy registered by the department, and that results in a degree or diploma recognized as meeting the educational requirements for the practice of physical therapy in the country where the studies were completed by the civil authorities of that country.

Physical therapists must pass exams to obtain their licenses.

The National Physical Therapy Examination and other exams with content deemed comparable may be accepted by the department.

Physical therapists can only have certain licenses.

According to section 6735(c) of the Education Law, the department may renew a physical therapy limited permission if the following criteria are met: a demonstrable need for additional clinical training under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist, or adequate documentation of extenuating circumstances that precluded the permittee from taking the licensing examination. evidence that the permittee is actively pursuing licensure by keeping open applications for examination and licensure; and submitting an application for renewal of a limited physical therapy permit along with paying the amount specified in section 6735 of the Education Law.

No renewal of a limited permit may be granted, despite the provisions of subdivision (a) of this section, if the permittee is the subject of an ongoing professional misconduct investigation or if the department finds a reasonable basis for a professional misconduct investigation against the permittee, as described in title VIII of the Education Law.

As specified in section 6735(d) of the Education Law, on-site supervision of permittees entails the supervising physical therapist being present at the same location and easily accessible to the permittee.

Physical therapy assistants should pursue professional education.

The candidate must provide proof of each of the following to satisfy the certification’s requirements for professional education: completion of a two-year college program leading to registration by the department as a physical therapist assistant or accreditation by a national accreditation body that is satisfactory to the department;

finishing a physical therapy program that the government has decided is equal to a registered program for assistant physical therapists. A applicant may prove proficiency by completing a national examination that is acceptable to the department when sufficient program records are not available or a site visit is not practical to determine equivalency.

Experience for aides to physical therapists:

Beyond what is necessary as part of an educational program, there shall be no further experience necessary for physical therapist assistants who are registered with the department.

Physical therapist assistant supervision

A physical therapist licensed in the State of New York must be the primary supervisor of a physical therapist assistant. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b) of section 6738 of the Education Law with respect to maintenance programs in residential health care facilities, on-site supervision as required by section 6738(a) of the Education Law shall mean that the supervising physical therapist is physically present in the same facility and is readily available to the physical therapist assistant.

licensing tests for assistants to physical therapists.

The National Physical Therapy Examination for Physical Therapist Assistants or another exam deemed to be of equal content may be accepted by the department in lieu of passing grades.

Limited licenses are required for assistants to physical therapists.

A physical therapist assistant’s restricted permit may be renewed by the department in accordance with section 6741-a (c) of the Education Law if the following criteria are met: a demonstrable need for additional clinical training under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist; or sufficient evidence of extenuating circumstances that precluded the permittee from taking the licensing examination; and evidence that the permittee is actively pursuing licensure by keeping open applications for examination and licensure; and submitting an application for renewal of a limited permit for a physical therapist assistant and paying the amount specified in section 6741-a of the Education Law.

No renewal of a limited permit may be granted, despite the provisions of subdivision (a) of this section, if the permittee is the subject of an ongoing professional misconduct investigation or if the department finds a reasonable basis for a professional misconduct investigation against the permittee, as described in title VIII of the Education Law.

As specified in section 6741-a (d) of the Education Law, on-site supervision of permittees entails the supervising physical therapist being present at the same location and easily accessible to the permittee.

Without a referral, rendering care in the realm of physical therapy.

(Compliant as of November 23, 2006)

According to Education Law section 6731(d), a licensed physical therapist may treat a patient in the practice of physical therapy for 10 visits or 30 days, whichever comes first, without a referral from a doctor, dentist, podiatrist, or nurse practitioner, provided the licensed physical therapist satisfies the following criteria: the licensed physical therapist has completed at least 4,320 clock hours of physical therapy practice over a minimum of 36 months anytime prior to beginning such treatment, meaning the licensed physical therapist has practiced physical therapy on a full-time basis equivalent to not less than three years before beginning such treatment; and

All conditions of subdivision (a) of this section pertaining to the notice of advice are satisfied by the certified physical therapist. notice of counsel In accordance with Education Law section 6731(d) and the requirements of this section, a physical therapist who provides treatment in the practice of physical therapy without a referral from a doctor, dentist, podiatrist, or nurse practitioner shall notify the patient in writing before beginning treatment of the possibility that such treatment may not be covered by the patient’s health care plan or insurer without a referral from a doctor, dentist, podiatrist, or nurse practitioner. This advise must be presented on a form, a copy of which must be supplied to the patient as well as kept on file as a patient record by the licensed physical therapist. The following details must be on the notice of advice form:

a declaration stating the advice in question and a declaration confirming that the patient has read the notice of advice;

the time that therapy will start;

the name and address of the patient;

the patient’s signature on the form, along with the date that they did so;

Name and address of the physical therapist who is providing care;

The physical therapist who is providing treatment must sign the document and include the date of signature.

Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants should continue their education.

(As of May 14, 2009)

Definitions. Throughout this section: An organization recognized for this purpose by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation is one that the department accepts as a dependable authority for the purpose of accreditation at the postsecondary level and that applies its criteria for granting accreditation in a fair, consistent, and nondiscriminatory manner.

Higher education institution refers to a postsecondary institution that awards degrees and is approved by a reliable accrediting body. compliance with requirements.

Except for licensees who are exempt from the requirement, who obtain an adjustment to the requirement in accordance with paragraph (2) of this subdivision, or who are subject to a differential, every licensed physical therapist and certified physical therapist assistant, required under Article 136 of the Education Law to register with the department to practice in New York State, shall comply with the mandatory continuing education requirements as prescribed in subdivision (c) of this section.

Exemptions and modifications to the demand.

Exemptions. Licensees holding the following licenses are excluded from the subdivision (c) of this section’s obligations regarding continuous education: licensees for the three-year term following their initial New York State licensure as a physical therapist or certified physical therapist assistant; and

Unless otherwise specified in subsection (e) of this section, licensed physical therapists or certified physical therapist assistants who are not practicing physical therapy as shown by their lack of a New York State license to do so are not permitted to resume their work in the state. modifications to the prerequisite. If the licensee documents good cause that prevents compliance or the department determines otherwise that there is good cause that prevents compliance, which shall include, but not be limited to, any of the following reasons: poor health or a specific physical or mental disability certified by an appropriate health care professional, the licensee may request a modification to the continuing education requirement as prescribed in subdivision (c) of this section.

compulsory requirements for ongoing education.

General prerequisite.

An applicant for registration must complete at least 36 hours of continuing education, acceptable to the department, as described in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, during each triennial registration period, which is a registration period of three years. Any licensed physical therapist or certified physical therapist assistant whose first registration date after September 1, 2009 occurs less than three years from that date, but on or after January 1, 2010, is required to fulfill continuing education requirements on a prorated basis at the rate of one-half hour of acceptable formal continuing education per month for the period beginning January 1, 2010, up until the first registration date thereafter. These requirements for continuing education must be met between September 1, 2009, and the start day of the next registration session.

Proration. Unless otherwise specified in this section, an applicant for registration must complete acceptable continuing education, as defined in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, on a prorated basis at a rate of one hour of continuing education per month for such registration period, unless otherwise specified in this section. formal continuous education that is acceptable. The conditions of this sentence must be met for continuing education to be accepted by the department. These continuing education courses must cover the topics listed in subparagraph I of this paragraph, be the formats listed in subparagraph (ii), and be subject to the restrictions listed in subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph.

Subjects. Acceptable continuing education must focus on one or more of the following topics and support the professional practice of physical therapy. actions that advance understanding and proficiency in physical therapy examination, evaluation, prognosis, planning, intervention, re-examination, prevention, and results; therapeutic approaches, evidence-based models, and the physical therapy profession’s guiding ideas;

difficulties with patient communications, documentation, and payment; general business procedures and oversight; educational approaches or other subjects that support the practice of physical therapy professionally; or concerns of health care, legislation, and/or ethics that affect physical therapy practice professionally and the public’s health, safety, and welfare. kinds of educational activities. The learning activities listed in this subparagraph that are acceptable for continuing education must also adhere to the restrictions listed in this subparagraph and subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph.

courses of study. Courses offered by sponsors with departmental approval in accordance with subdivision I of this section qualify as acceptable continuing education, and may include, among other things, courses offered by approved sponsors, credit and non-credit courses at universities and colleges, as well as professional development and technical sessions pertaining to the practice of physical therapy. other educational pursuits. The following additional educational activities are permitted as continuing education: planning for and conducting a course that is approved under subdivision I of this section and is offered to physical therapists or physical therapist assistants, with the exception that the licensee may not conduct the course more than once without presenting updated or new information.

The actual instructional time as well as preparation time, which might be up to an extra two hours for every hour of presentation, could all count toward the continuing education hours that could be awarded for this activity. putting together and instructing a department-approved course on the practice of physical therapy at a higher education facility; provided, however, that the licensee may not instruct the course more than once without introducing fresh or updated content. The actual instructional time as well as preparation time, which might be up to an extra two hours for every hour of presentation, could all count toward the continuing education hours that could be awarded for this activity. making a technical presentation at a professional conference sponsored by a group approved in accordance with subdivision I of this section and that sponsors continuing education for physical therapists and physical therapist assistants; however, such a presentation is not acceptable if the licensee has already spoken on the subject without presenting new or revised material. For this activity, continuing education hours may be granted for both the presentation time itself and the preparation time, which may total up to two extra hours for every hour of presentation. obtaining a speciality certification or recertification from a source that the department accepts, as long as the credit hours for continuing education that are given for such certification or recertification are within the department’s set parameters. completing a self-study program, or structured study, offered by a sponsor approved under subdivision I of this section that is based on audio, audio-visual, written, online, and other media but excludes live instruction, transmitted in person or otherwise, during which the learner may communicate and interact with the instructor and other learners;

producing a chapter or article that is published in a book or peer-reviewed journal, as long as the department-prescribed quantity of continuing education credit is offered for such an activity; or completing and passing a test recognized by the department that gauges a licensee’s understanding of New York’s laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the practice of physical therapy. A passing score on such an exam will result in two hours of continuing education credit;

Prohibition. The department shall not recognize as appropriate continuing education any continuing education created with the express intent of increasing profits for the practice of a physical therapist or a physical therapist assistant.

Registration re-registration Physical therapists who hold a license and certified physical therapist assistants who are renewing their registration must certify to the department that they have either met the continuing education requirements outlined in this section or are exempt from or subject to adjustments to those requirements as outlined in subdivision (b) of this section.

requirement for a practice lapse.

The following requirements must be fulfilled by a licensee who is resuming the practice of physical therapy after a break in practice, as shown by the fact that they are not registered to do so in New York State, and whose first registration date following the break in practice and after September 1, 2009 occurs less than three years from January 1, 2010. a licensee who has not lawfully practiced physical therapy continuously in another jurisdiction throughout such lapse period must complete at least one-half hour of acceptable continuing education every month starting on January 1, 2010, until the start of the new registration period. This requirement also applies to licensees who have lawfully practiced as physical therapists or physical thers the regular continuing education requirement during the new registration period for a licensee who has continuously practiced physical therapy in another jurisdiction throughout the lapse period, and at least 12 hours of acceptable continuing education for a licensee who has not continuously practiced as a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant in another jurisdiction during the lapse period.

A licensee who resumes their practice as a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant following a period during which they were not registered to do so in New York State and were not lawfully practicing continuously in another jurisdiction must complete the following, with the exception of what is required in paragraph (1) of this subdivision for the registrations therein specified:

the requirement for continuing education that was in effect during the time the licensee had its last registration period; a minimum of one hour of appropriate continuing education, up to a maximum of 36 hours, must be completed during the 12 months prior to the start of the new registration period for each month that registration has expired; and

If such registration is renewed, at least 12 hours of appropriate continuing education must be completed in each subsequent 12-month period until the next registration date.

A licensee who resumes the practice of physical therapy or physical therapist assistant after a lapse in practice during which the licensee was not registered to do so in New York State but did lawfully practice physical therapy continuously in another jurisdiction throughout the lapse period is required to complete the following requirements, with the exception of those listed in paragraph (1) of this subdivision for registrations therein specified: the requirement for continuing education that applied to the time the licensee was registered during the licensee’s last registration period; and a minimum of one hour of acceptable continuing education, up to a total of 36 hours, must be completed during the new registration period or, at the licensee’s discretion, during the period starting 36 months prior to the start of the new registration period and ending at the end of the new registration period; over the new registration period, the usual ongoing education requirement.registration with conditions.

A licensee who attests to or admits to not complying with the continuing education requirements of this section may receive a conditional registration from the department if they satisfy the following criteria:

Within the time frame of the conditional registration, the licensee promises to fix the issue:

During this conditional registration term, the licensee commits to fulfill the normal continuing education requirement by completing one hour of appropriate continuing education each month; and

The licensee consents to completing any additional continuing education that the department may require throughout the period of conditional registration in order to guarantee that the licensee is providing professional physical therapy services that are appropriate for the licensee’s practice as a physical therapist or physical therapist assistant.

Such conditional registration is only valid for a maximum of one year and cannot be renewed or extended. licensee data. Each licensee subject to the requirements of this section shall keep, or ensure that the department has access to, a record of completed continuing education that includes the following information: the title of the course, if one was taken, the type of educational activity, if one was, the subject of the continuing education, the number of hours completed, the sponsor’s name and any identifying number (if applicable), attendance verification, if one was taken, and participation. These records must be kept for at least six years after the date the continuing education was completed and must be made accessible for the department to review in order to comply with this section’s requirements. study of continuous education measurement. Only appropriate continuing education that follows the guidelines in subdivision (c) of this section is eligible for continuing education credit. One continuing education hour of credit for continuing education courses must last at least 50 minutes. Other educational activities may receive continuing education credit if done in accordance with departmental guidelines.

Sponsor consent.

Sponsors of continuing education for licensed physical therapists and certified physical therapist assistants through courses of study or self-study programs must fulfill the standards of either paragraph (2) or (3) of this section in order to get departmental approval.

Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants who are licensed must be sponsored by an organization that the department deems to be acceptable for offering courses of study or self-study programs for continuing education: a national physical therapy association or another professional group that the department deems suitable and that promotes best practices in the field of physical therapy across the country or in a particular region; a New York State physical therapy organization that is accredited by the department, is incorporated in New York State or otherwise set up there, and promotes best practices for the physical therapy professions throughout the State of New York and/or in a specific area of the State of New York; a national association of jurisdictional boards for physical therapy that supports ethical conduct in the field and works to advance the public’s health, safety, and welfare; a body, facility, or hospital as described in Section 2801 of the Public Health Law; and a center for higher learning.

Organizational review of sponsors

If a sponsor does not meet the requirements of paragraph (2) of this section, the department shall assess the sponsor’s application for approval to offer continuing education to licensed physical therapists and physical therapist assistants.

At least 90 days before the start date of the continuing education, an organization that wishes to offer continuing education based on a department review under this clause must submit, along with the fee specified in subdivision (j) of this section, an application for advance approval as a sponsor that demonstrates that the organization: will provide classes or programs for independent study in one or more of the topics listed in subparagraph of this section as approved continuing education; is a postsecondary school that is not already deemed approved in accordance with subparagraph of this article, or an entity that possesses knowledge in the professional fields that will be taught; instructors who are specially qualified authorities in physical therapy, as determined by the department with assistance from the State Board for Physical Therapy, to conduct such courses; instructors who are qualified to teach the courses that will be offered, including but not limited to faculty of a physical therapy program offered by a higher education institution;

Provides a technique for measuring participants’ learning and outlines that technique; and will keep records for at least six years following the completion of the coursework. These records must include, but are not restricted to, the name and curriculum vitae of the faculty, a record of the licensed physical therapists’ or physical therapist assistants’ attendance in the course, if one was taken, a record of their participation in the self-instructional coursework, if it was taken, and an outline of the course. The governing body of an approved sponsor must notify the department and transfer all records as instructed by the department if the sponsor decides to stop operating.

Sponsors who are authorized by the department in accordance with this paragraph’s conditions shall be authorized for a period of three years.

The sponsor shall cooperate with the department in allowing such site visits and in providing such information. The department may conduct site visits of, or request information from, a sponsor approved in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph to ensure compliance with such requirements.

If the department determines that a sponsor approved in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph is not complying with those standards, the sponsor’s approval status will be denied or terminated.

Posted on

From Early Intervention to CPSE

How to Make the Transition

Program for Early Intervention


A child must either (1) have a developmental delay that meets the State definition of developmental delay or (2) have a diagnosed condition that has a high likelihood of causing a developmental delay in order to qualify for EIP treatment.
Developmental delay is described in EIP regulations 10 NYCRR Section 69-4.1(g) as follows: “Developmental delay refers to a child not having reached developmental milestones in one or more of the following areas of development: cognitive, physical (including vision and hearing), communication, social/emotional, or adaptive development for the child’s chronological age adjusted for prematurity.

Why an IEP is Important
For the purposes of the EIP, a developmental delay is defined as one that is at least one of the following: a 12 month delay in one functional area; a 33 percent delay in one functional area; a 25 percent delay in each of two areas; or, if appropriate standardized instruments are administered individually during the evaluation process, a score of at least one “
According to the EIP regulations’ Section 69-4.3(e), diagnosed conditions with a high probability of delay include chromosomal abnormalities linked to developmental delays (such as Down syndrome), syndromes and conditions linked to delays in development (such as fetal alcohol syndrome), neuromuscular disorders (such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, microcephaly, or macrocephaly), and clinical evidence of central nervous system abnormalities.
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) codes for a number of diagnoses with a high likelihood of developmental delay were included in the NYS DOH’s 1999 guidance on these disorders, which should be utilized to determine eligibility.
Special Education Programs and Services for Preschoolers
A preschool student with a disability is defined by the Education Law and Regulations as having either the following disorder or disability in one or more functional areas of development (Part 200.1(mm)) or a specified condition (Part 200.1(zz)):
When a kid displays a severe delay or dysfunction in one or more functional areas connected to cognitive, language and communication, adaptive, socioemotional, or motor development, which negatively impacts the student’s capacity to learn, the child is said to have a disability. When reviewed collectively and compared to recognized milestones for child development, the results of the individual evaluation, which may include but is not limited to information in all functional areas obtained from a structured observation of a student’s performance and behavior, a parent interview, and other individually administered assessment procedures, must indicate: a 12 month delay in one or more functional areas; or
Preschoolers who meet the requirements for the following disability classifications in the Part 200 regulations can be labeled as preschool students with disabilities: autism; deafness; deaf-blindness; hearing impairment; orthopedic impairment (caused by congenital anomalies, disease, or impairments from other causes); other health impairments (including but not limited to heart condition, tuberculosis);
In order to be eligible for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, children must have a significant developmental delay that negatively affects the child’s capacity to study. If a child can be identified as having one of the aforementioned disabilities and it has been demonstrated that the handicap has a negative impact on the child’s capacity to learn, the child may also be eligible.

EI to CPSE transition: things to consider

Notifying CPSE of Potential Transition: What’s the Best Choice for the Child?

Early Assistance Officials are specifically tasked in the PHL with informing school districts of children who may be eligible for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, with parental approval, and with setting up transition conferences for these kids and their families. A referral to the CPSE may not be necessary for children who make considerable progress in EI and do not require special education services.

Every parent has the right to request that their kid be evaluated for special education services and programs in the school district where they live. Additionally, service providers and other referral sources recognized by the Education Law may submit a direct reference to the child’s school district on behalf of a child who may require special education programs and services.

The Child’s Progress: A Review

The child’s progress should be reviewed by the EIO, service coordinator, service providers, and parent(s) as the child gets closer to the age at which s/he becomes eligible for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law. When determining whether to refer a child enrolled in the Early Intervention Program for assistance under Section 4410 of the Education Law, the following factors should be taken into account:

the child’s functional abilities and needs; the nature and severity of the child’s disability, including whether the child has a condition that affects their capacity to learn; the child’s developmental progress and whether they are still experiencing significant developmental delays (or delays in multiple areas) that affect their capacity to learn; the child’s developmental and functional status; and the family’s perspective on the child’s development and capacity.

Get your Transition Conference notices in on time!

According to Section 2548 of the PHL and Section 69-4.20(b) of the EIP regulations, the EIO must notify the school district where a child resides, with parental permission, of the child’s potential eligibility for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law at least 120 days before the child first becomes eligible for those services. A transition conference between the EIO, service coordinator, parent, and the chair (or her/his designee) of the CPSE must also be organized by the EIO with parental consent at least 90 days prior to the child’s first eligibility for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, or the child’s third birthday, whichever comes first. It may be appropriate to invite representatives of that agency, with the parent’s permission, if the child is already receiving services from that agency or may require additional services from that agency (for instance, if the child is enrolled in an Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (OPWDD) waiver program or may be eligible for services under OPWDD).

The holding of the transition meeting, notification of the CPSE of the child’s possible eligibility for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, and referral to the school district all require parental approval.

The parent(s) have due process rights under the EIP if the EIO fails to ensure that the school district is informed of the child’s potential eligibility for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law and a referral is not made to the CPSE within the necessary timeframes to ensure an eligibility determination is made by the CPSE before the child turns three. Up until the conclusion of all due process procedures, the child should continue to receive the services listed in the most current IFSP. However, if parents refuse to give timely assent to an EIO referral to the CPSE and refuse to give timely approval for the CPSE to evaluate the child, there are no due process protections for parents under the EIP. A list of the parent consents needed for the transition process is provided in Appendix E, together with sample consent forms for significant transitional events.

Children may be grouped by the month in which their birth dates fall for managing the notification and transition conference obligations at the municipal level, provided that notices are received and transition conferences are scheduled within the necessary deadlines. The eligibility and transition dates are outlined in the chart in Appendix F.

The chair of the CPSE, or his or her designee, is required by Section 4410 of the Education Law to take part in transition conferences held by the EIO for kids who might be eligible for services under that section. The CPSE chair or designee should be invited to attend the conference, and the session’s date, time, and venue should be specified in the notice to the school district. The CPSE chair or designee should also be made aware that, in the event that they are unable to attend in person, they may participate by phone in the conference.

The Transition Conference’s objectives and content

Investigating the Best Programs for Transition

The transition conference aims to assess program alternatives available to the child and family, prepare a transition plan, and determine whether the child should be sent to preschool special education programs and assistance under Section 4410 of the Education Law. Before a transition meeting is held, there may be some instances in which a child is sent to the CPSE. Even if the child has previously been recommended for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, the parent must be given the chance to take part in a transition meeting.

In this conversation, parents should be made aware of the following:

The EIO is responsible for ensuring that children who may qualify for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law are sent to the CPSE of the school district where they attend, with parental permission.

In accordance with the Education Law, the parent, as well as service providers and other referral sources (such as healthcare professionals), may also recommend the kid to the CPSE directly.

In order to guarantee the continuation of services past the child’s third birthday, the kid must be found to be eligible for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law before that age.

Following receipt of a referral from the EIO, the parent, a service provider, or any other referral source permitted by the Education Law, the CPSE will get in touch with the parent to tell them of the CPSE evaluation procedure.

In order for the CPSE to evaluate the kid and establish whether or not the child qualifies for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, the parent’s permission is required. For the child to continue receiving EIP services, this consent to evaluate the kid must be given to the CPSE in time for the child to be reviewed and eligibility determined before the child turns three. The parent must be informed by the EIO that the CPSE must acquire the permission as soon as possible in order for the CPSE to make an eligibility decision before the kid turns three.

After receiving parental approval, the CPSE has 30 school days to evaluate the kid and make a recommendation to the board of education.

The CPSE must follow up with the parent to make sure they have received and comprehend the request to evaluate the kid if the parent does not fill out and return the consent form for the examination of the child.

CPSE: The Transition Meeting and Parental Agreement

With parental permission, the most recent EIP evaluation report for the child, along with other EIP evaluation and assessment records, can be given to the CPSE and are an important tool for CPSE members to use when determining the kind and scope of evaluation required to determine a child’s eligibility for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law. Parents should be urged to collaborate with their service coordinator to find and pick relevant reports and documents that may be useful in the CPSE’s evaluation and eligibility determination process, and to provide the CPSE their permission to transmit these records. Before transferring to preschool special education, re-evaluation of the children by the EIP is not essential nor obligatory. This clause aims to cut down on pointless or redundant child evaluations.

The parent has two options if their kid is found to be in need of services under Section 4410 of the Education Law before turning three: they can move the child into special education preschool programs and services, or they can decide to keep them in the EIP until they reach adulthood.

Is Parental Participation in Preschool Special Education Optional?

Similar to EIP services, parental participation in the child’s participation in preschool special education programs and services is entirely optional.

The child and family’s involvement in the EIP will stop at the child’s third birthday if no referral is made, the kid is not evaluated, and no eligibility determination is made as a result for assistance under Section 4410 of the Education Law before the child turns three. The child and family’s participation in the EIP ends at the kid’s third birthday if the parent fails to timely sign and send the consent to the child’s evaluation to the CPSE, which prevents the CPSE from making an eligibility determination before the child turns three. A transition strategy will be created, and it can call for referring people to alternative providers (e.g., Head Start, other early childhood programs). The day before the child’s third birthday will mark the IFSP’s final day of services.

The child’s eligibility for the EIP will expire at the age of three if the CPSE determines that Section 4410 of the Education Law does not apply to them, and a transition plan to other suitable early childhood and supportive services will be created. The day before the child’s third birthday will be the final day for services under the IFSP.

The kid’s eligibility for the EIP will cease at age three if the parent timely signed and delivered the consent to the child’s evaluation to the CPSE and the CPSE does not determine eligibility before the child turns three. The day before the child’s third birthday will be the final day for services under the IFSP. While a decision from the CPSE is pending, the parent has the right to seek preschool special education services under Section 4410 of the Education Law.

The transition of a child from the EIP to preschool special education is greatly influenced by the parents. In accordance with Section 4410 of the Education Law, it is crucial that parents actively assist their children in making the transition from the Early Intervention Program to preschool special education programs and services. Parents should take advantage of the transition conference to learn about all their options and get involved in the transition process. The EIO should advise the parent in writing of all the aforementioned details that would ordinarily be covered at the transition conference, even if the parent decides not to attend the transition conference. Appendix G contains a sample notification.

How to Refer a Child to the Preschool Special Education Committee

A formal request for the school system to assess the kid to determine whether he or she requires special education services is known as a referral to CPSE. The parent, a physician, a judge, a designated individual in a government institution, a representative from an Early Childhood Direction Center, a preschool program that has received approval, or a representative from the EIP are just a few of the people who can refer a child to the CPSE. Parental approval is necessary before the child can be evaluated after the referral has been made.

If it is decided to refer the child to the CPSE during the transition meeting and the parent agrees,

If it is decided to refer the child to the CPSE during the transition meeting and the parent agrees, the EIO must refer the child in writing to the CPSE chairperson in the school district where the kid resides. If the parent abstains from the transition meeting, the EIO is still obligated to submit the child to the CPSE with parental permission if the EIO thinks the child may qualify for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law. The amount of EIP services the child had previously received must be specified in the recommendation.

A CPSE chairman who receives a referral is required to contact the parent as soon as possible by phone or in writing to inform them that a referral has been received and to obtain their permission to evaluate the child. The parent must give written permission to the CPSE in order for the CPSE to conduct the evaluation. It is crucial for parents to react as soon as possible with written agreement to the evaluation of their children in order for the CPSE to be able to determine the children’s eligibility before their third birthday. This will help prevent unneeded disruption of programs and services.

The CPSE must ensure that the process to establish a child’s eligibility and need for special education programs and services is started and finished in time for kids to start receiving services on their third birthday or the first date of eligibility, whichever comes first, once the CPSE has received written parental consent to evaluate a child.

If the parent declines to give consent for a specific preschool evaluation, the CPSE must contact the parent again to be sure they have received and comprehended the request for consent. The CPSE and service coordinator should inform the parent that the child and family’s participation in the EIP will end on the child’s third birthday and a transition plan will be developed, which may include referral to other services, if parental consent is not given in time for an evaluation and eligibility determination by the CPSE before the child turns three (e.g., Head Start, other early childhood services).

Process of CPSE Evaluation

A parent will be requested to provide written authorization to have their kid examined by an approved evaluator of their choosing once the child has been referred for a special education examination. The CPSE chair or his or her designee will also give the parent a copy of the Procedural Safeguard Notice, which fully explains their rights under IDEA. The CPSE must meet to examine the results of the evaluation and make a recommendation regarding the preschool child’s eligibility for special education programs and services within 30 school days of receiving the parent’s agreement for the child’s evaluation. According to Section 200.1(mm) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education, eligibility is assessed. Visit the “Guide for Determining Eligibility for Preschool Special Education Programs and/or Services for Preschool Students with Disabilities” for more details on eligibility determinations and parental rights (available on the SED Web site, www.vesid.nysed.gov).

It is crucial for the parent of the child to comprehend that they are a part of the school district’s CPSE for their child. Parents are heavily involved in the child’s evaluation, the CPSE’s discussion of preschool special education eligibility, and the design and creation of the child’s individualized education program (IEP). The child’s strengths, needs, likes, dislikes, and usual behavior with relation to self-care, language and communication, motor abilities, and social interaction with peers and adults can all be discussed by parents, along with the child’s development, health, and family history.

It is significant to note that the CPSE may consider some or all of the evaluations conducted under the EIP, with parental approval, in determining whether a child qualifies for preschool special education programs and assistance under Section 4410 of the Education Law. The CPSE may decide the evaluation is adequate to determine eligibility or may decide to request more evaluations.

: A Look At The Requirements For A CPSE Evaluation

The day before the child turns three, if the CPSE judges that a child is not eligible for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, that child will lose access to the EIP, and a transition plan to alternative early childhood and supportive services will be created. Parents should raise their concerns with the CPSE if they disagree or if it takes too long to make a recommendation. Additionally, for more information and technical support, parents and school districts can get in touch with the regional offices of the Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities (VESID) Special Education Quality Assurance (see Appendix H for contact information). If informal dispute resolution is not possible, mediation may be employed to quickly settle issues. Additionally, parents have the right to write to the BOE and request an impartial hearing. Unless parents or the school district request a review of the judgment by a State Review Officer, the impartial hearing officer’s (IHO) decision is considered final.

Pendency for the child is an approved preschool special education program and/or services agreed to by the CPSE and the parents, appropriate to meet the child’s needs (Section 200.16(g)(3)(iv) of the Regulations of the Commissioner), until all proceedings have been concluded. The placement of the child will be decided by the IHO if the CPSE and the parents are unable to come to an agreement. Only if the early intervention program is also an authorized preschool program is it possible for a child who has received Early Intervention Services and is now of preschool age to receive special education during hearings and appeals in the same program as the early intervention program.

Parents may file a formal complaint with the New York State Education Department, Coordinator, Statewide Education Quality Assurance, if they believe that their school districts have violated policies outlined in State or federal special education laws and regulations (see Appendix H). Unless there are extraordinary circumstances pertaining to the particular complaint, complaints are looked into and decisions are taken within sixty calendar days of receipt.

If a child is determined to be eligible for preschool special education programs and services, the parent must be notified that the child may transfer to those programs and services or remain in the EIP after turning three years old until they reach adulthood. The CPSE is in charge of setting up the provider(s) to offer the preschool special education programs and services for the child when they transition to preschool special education programs and services in his or her IEP.

IEPs and IFSPs Still Available for Preschoolers After Third Birthday

IEPs and IFSPs for Kids Who Qualify for Preschool Special Education Programs and Services Still Available in the EIP After Third Birthday

The committee must suggest suitable special education services and/or programs and create an individualized education program (IEP) for the preschooler in compliance with State and federal laws and regulations if the CPSE concludes that the child has a disability. Regardless of whether the parent chooses for the child to transition to services under Section 4410 of the Education Law or remain in the EIP on and after the kid turns three, an IEP must be created for every child found to be eligible for preschool special education programs and services. Based on the agreement made by the CPSE and the child’s initial eligibility for preschool special education, the CPSE must specify in the IEP the date for the start of special education programs and services.

The CPSE may take into account a variety of special education programs or services while creating the IEP in order to best meet the requirements of the child. The least restrictive environment must be taken into account when implementing the suggestion for special education services. Following is a list of the four learning settings, in decreasing order of degree of restriction:

associated services such occupational, physical, and speech therapy.

A special education teacher works with a child in a community or home setting that has been suggested by the CPSE (special education itinerant teacher, or SEIT).

A special class with preschoolers with impairments and their generally developing peers is known as a “integrated setting” (SC/IS).

A Special Class for Preschoolers with Disabilities Only

A special class (SC) is a group of preschoolers with disabilities only.

The committee shall explore offering special education services in a setting where age-appropriate peers without disabilities are normally present before proposing special education services in a setting that only includes preschool children with disabilities. When the nature or severity of the child’s disability is such that education in a less restrictive environment, with the use of supplemental aids and services, cannot be achieved satisfactorily, the provision of special education services in a setting without regular contact with age-appropriate peers without disabilities must be documented on the child’s IEP.

Parents have the right to voice preferences for services during the CPSE process, and their preferences must be taken into account. However, the CPSE must suggest suitable programs and services for each eligible kid based on the members’ consensus. If the CPSE suggests programs and services other than what the parents requested, the proposal must state the parent’s preference as well as the CPSE’s reasoning. Additionally, parents must be informed of their entitlement to due process, including how to oppose the CPSE’s recommendation and how to learn about the actions the CPSE will take.

The CPSE (which includes a professional selected by the EIO responsible with overseeing the child’s transition from the EIP) must communicate the following to the child’s parent at the time the IEP is created:

The IEP’s and IFSP’s differences.

The parent can decide whether they want their child to finish the transition to preschool special education programs and services under the IEP or whether they want them to keep receiving the services under the IFSP for the child and family until they are no longer considered to be of an age to qualify for the EIP.

CPSE makes it easier for parents to choose

The CPSE must state on the IEP whether the parent wants the child to transition to services under Section 4410 of the Education Law or continue receiving services in the child’s and family’s IFSP until the child is no longer age-eligible for the EIP, as well as the date special education programs and services will begin based on the CPSE’s agreement, the date the child is first eligible for preschool special education, and more.

The child’s transition from EIP services to preschool special education programs and services will be outlined in the amended IFSP.

The child may be transitioned to services under Section 4410 of the Education Law by the parent at any time, even before the IEP’s start date.

The board of education must make arrangements for the child to start receiving the suggested special education programs and services commencing with the program’s approved July, September, or January commencement date after receiving the CPSE’s recommendation. The services must, however, be delivered no later than 30 school days following the recommendation if the CPSE’s recommendation is issued less than 30 school days before or after the July, September, or January starting date. The BOE must make arrangements for the child to begin receiving programs and services on the date suggested by the CPSE in order to prevent a gap in services for those children who will remain in the EIP on and after their third birthday.

CPSE and Annual Review: A Look at Your Child’s Progress

When creating a child’s IEP, parents and the CPSE must decide how and when to update the parents on the child’s development. Progress reports must be given at least as frequently for non-disabled students enrolled in a regular education program in the student’s school district once the child moves to preschool special education programs and supports. Regular phone calls from the child’s teacher or service provider, notes and comments in a shared notebook, or formal progress reports that describe the child’s progress toward IEP goals and indicate whether the child is anticipated to meet those goals by the target date are all acceptable ways to report progress.

IEPs for kids need to be reviewed at least once every year. To discuss a child’s development or to review a child’s program, parents, the school district CPSE, or the provider of the preschool program may also request a meeting at any point during the academic year.

Children in the Early Intervention Program who are in foster care must follow all of the transitional steps outlined above (EIP). However, the local social services commissioner in charge of the child for foster children must be involved in the transition planning process (i.e., the local social services commissioner who has the care and custody or custody and guardianship of the child). If the child requires a referral for services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, the local social services commissioner should be invited to take part in the evaluation of the IFSP and, if necessary, the child’s transition conference.

It’s also critical to remember that, in some cases, the EIO or Committee on Preschool Special Education may need to appoint a surrogate parent for a child in foster care (CPSE). For the purposes of providing services under Section 4410 of the Education Law, the CPSE may continue to use the surrogate parent who the EIO selected to represent a child in foster care, or it may be necessary for the CPSE to choose a different surrogate parent. For the purposes of the Early Intervention Program and preschool special education programs and services, a surrogate parent who has been designated by the EIO or the CPSE is given all the rights and obligations of the child’s parent.

Posted on

The Importance of both Gross and Fine Motor Development

How does motor development progress in early childhood?

The background of children motor development

As children’s motor development changes, they have new possibilities to engage with things, their surroundings, and adults. According to earlier studies, early infancy and childhood gross and fine motor skills are predictive of later language results. Fine and large motor abilities, however, allow for various interactions. As a result, the developmental paths by which cascading changes in language may emerge may possibly vary between gross and fine motor skills. The purpose of the current study was to find out if there were any variations in how well gross and fine motor skills predicted language outcomes throughout early childhood during usual development.

Method studies uncover new development secrets

Studies evaluating the development of children’s gross and/or fine motor skills and language in the 0 to 5 age range were systematically reviewed to determine the state of the literature on the motor-language cascades. PsycINFO, PubMed, and MEDLINE were all searched. The keywords combined “language,” “language development,” or “communication skills” with “gross motor,” “fine motor,” “motor performance,” or “psychomotor development.” Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, two impartial reviewers divided the complete texts and abstracts for screening.

Results: 23 items in all were kept. Seven of these studies solely evaluated gross motor abilities, four assessed fine motor abilities exclusively, and 12 assessed both in the same experiment. Studies assessed language development, gross motor skills, and fine motor skills using a range of methods (such as parent reports, in-lab observations, and standardized tests), and the results differed depending on the analysis utilized. The results showed that both gross and fine motor skills are associated to language outcomes, but since there are less studies that looked at fine motor skills, it is impossible to say which is more crucial for language outcomes.

Why it’s important to be patient with your child’s development? 

 From infancy until early childhood, both gross and fine motor skills support language development. The current state of our understanding of the mechanisms underlying motor-language cascades is explored, along with the need for additional research on fine motor abilities.

Keywords: language, infancy, toddlerhood, preschool, motor, fine motor, and gross motor

How Does Motor Development Progress?

Research on motor development has traditionally been referred to as the Cinderella of developmental science: it is crucial to understanding children’s experiences, but is rarely highlighted (Rosenbaum, 2005; Adolph et al., 2010). Early in the 20th century, a historically maturational perspective to motor skills predominated, which primarily contended that motor development occurs through predefined biological changes with little to no influence from the environment or cognitive domains (e.g., Gesell and Amatruda, 1945). Because motor skills were separated from cognition, there has been very little research on how these abilities, which are essential for newborn independence and exploration, affect other areas of development, like language. Similarly, beliefs that language is universal and modular (Chomsky, 1975) probably also contributed to the greater separation of language and motor skills. The notion of cross-domain interactions leading to cascade changes at times when the growing system is in flux, however, has recently been accepted in study thanks to ongoing trends toward ecological and systems approaches to development (Gibson, 1988; Thelen and Smith, 2006; Masten and Cicchetti, 2010; Spencer et al., 2011). More and more studies are finding that motor abilities are important for children’s language outcomes, according to the developing literature on motor-language cascades (e.g., Iverson, 2010; Oudgenoeg-Paz et al., 2012; Walle, 2016).

Gross motor and fine motor skills are the two main categories used to classify motor development. Large muscle movements are a part of gross motor skills, which include autonomous sitting, crawling, walking, and running. The usage of smaller muscles is required for fine motor activities like gripping, manipulating objects, and sketching. It is unclear if one type of motor ability is more consistently associated to language outcomes than the other, despite the fact that numerous studies have looked into the impact of motor skills on language development (e.g., Walle and Campos, 2014; Leonard et al., 2015; Choi et al., 2018). Recent studies have shown that conditions like autism spectrum disorder and specific language impairment are associated with delays in motor development (Leonard and Hill, 2014; West, 2018). Particularly, in populations at risk, motor difficulties can be detected before diagnosis, positioning motor abilities as a potential early predictor for subsequent consequences (Bhat et al., 2012; Flanagan et al., 2012; Lebarton and Iverson, 2013; Libertus et al., 2014). Not all people with motor challenges will have poor language development, so it’s crucial to remember that motor development is neither sufficient nor necessary for language development (Iverson, 2010). However, given recent findings showing that a variety of factors, including motor skills, influence language development, it is important that researchers look into potential variations in how different motor skill types relate to language development in typical samples to guide future clinical research.

In order to disentangle the cross relationships between language development and gross and fine motor skills, the current systematic review will discuss the body of literature on gross and fine motor skills in connection to language outcomes. Since both motor skills and language abilities are rapidly changing during this time period, we will concentrate on infancy through early childhood (0-5 years of age) in order to capture findings during early development. This will allow for a better understanding of how motor and language relate while the system is in flux (Thelen and Smith, 2006; Masten and Cicchetti, 2010).

A Step-by-Step Guide to Planning Your Methods Study

Using PRISMA principles, a systematic review of the available research on the cascading relationships between motor and language development that spans from infancy through early childhood was carried out.

Beginning on July 6, 2018, article searches throughout the PsycINFO, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases were carried out. To prevent potentially tailored search results, no Google Scholar searches were made (Holone, 2016; Curkovic, 2019). The keywords combined “language,” “language development,” or “communication skills” with “gross motor,” “fine motor,” “motor performance,” or “psychomotor development.” To better target search results for the topic of the current review, database options for only human, peer-reviewed papers, and age limits of participants (infancy through 5 years old) were chosen where they were available. 6,210 items in all were deemed to be potentially pertinent.

Using the internet tool Abstrackr, an open-source tool for systematic reviews, two independent reviewers (the first and second author) further scanned abstracts (Wallace et al., 2012). Early in the abstract review process, Abstrackr suggests possibly more pertinent articles. It also enables semi-automated abstract rejection through the use of algorithm-based machine taught patterns that draw on the patterns of earlier manual abstract rejections by human reviewers (Rathbone et al., 2015). Depending on the complexity of the systematic review, research shows that the Abstrackr algorithm offers good precision and low levels of false-negatives (Rathbone et al., 2015). As a result, extra resources like Google Scholar weren’t utilised during the search phase. Both independent reviewers personally screened 3,000 papers, and the remaining 3,210 abstracts were reviewed using the Abstrackr algorithm in order to maximize accuracy and balance speed. Two of the 3,210 abstracts that were left after being only evaluated by the Abstrackr algorithm were marked as potentially relevant for additional full text review. Duplicate abstracts were included in the abstract review on Abstrackr. After abstract screening, 2,049 of the total sample of 6,210 articles were determined to be duplicates and were excluded from further full text review. For a total of 129 articles chosen for full text review, the first author added two extra articles based on prior knowledge of their relevance to the systematic review and one article was added based on reviewer comments.

Eligibility Requirements for PT Intervention – What You Need to Know

Abstracts were evaluated for inclusion using the following criteria: (1) studies with a sample of children who were typically developing in order to avoid duplicating other reviews or meta analyses on atypical development (e.g., West, 2018); (2) studies with a sample of children between the ages of 0 and 5; (3) studies that measured both motor and language skills; and (4) studies written in English. Case studies, studies with just atypical groups, studies where only motor or only language skills were tested, and studies whose findings merely hinted at linkages between motor and language, among other things, were all excluded. (4) studies that did not distinguish between gross and fine motor skills (e.g., had a single global motor score); (5) studies where the measured motor skills were only speech-motor/oro-motor control (to avoid confusing with measures of language); rhythmic arm movement; handedness; gesture; motor imitation; or synchronized finger tapping; and (6) studies where language skil The reviewers discussed the abstract as a group if it was not evident from the abstract alone whether a study satisfied the inclusion or exclusion criteria. The article was included for additional full text review if the reviewers were unable to come to an understanding based just on the abstract.

The first and second authors read the entire manuscript, and where necessary, all three authors discussed any differences of opinion or final judgments regarding inclusion and exclusion. The aforementioned standards were still followed during the complete text examination. Studies with an atypical focus frequently included control groups that met inclusion criteria during abstract review, but upon full text reading (1) did not conduct analyses on motor-language cascades with the typically developing samples (i.e., conducted typical vs. atypical group comparisons only, or did not measure motor or language skills in the typical samples). Articles were carefully read for inclusion of analyses that detailed motor-language cascades in typical samples. For inclusion in the final article, only studies with results that were evident for children with typical development were considered. Studies that included children 0–5 years old as well as older age groups were only included if the motor and language findings were measured at a time point between 0–5 years old and the results for ages from 0 to 5 years were presented separately from the complete sample.

Posted on

Which is better for back pain: flexion or extension exercises?

Williams vs Mckenzie Exercises

Comparison of Williams Flexion and Mckenzie Extension

Both Williams and McKenzie are completely convinced that the stresses that are placed on the intervertebral discs as a result of poor posture are the primary factor that contributes to all cases of back pain. On the other hand, while they appear to share a consensus regarding the discal cause of back pain, they do not agree regarding the postural component. While McKenzie seems more concerned about the increasing extension in our world, Williams seems more concerned about the lack of flexion in our world.

Williams stated the following in a tone that suggested he was emphasizing his point: “Man, in forcing his body to stand erect, severely deforms the spine, redistributing body weight to the back edges of the intervertebral discs in both the low back and neck” (Williams, 1974). According to what I mentioned in my most recent article, Williams believed that the lordotic lumbar spine placed an excessive amount of strain on the posterior elements of the intervertebral disc, which led to the premature demise of the disc. To put it another way, Williams stated that the man complained of low back pain when he first stood in an upright position.

Additionally, McKenzie asserts that the disc is the primary factor in the development of back pain. However, in contrast to Williams, McKenzie hypothesizes that flexion, and not extension, is the cause of the problem. According to what McKenzie has written, an extended period of sitting in a flexed position is one of the risk factors that can lead to the development of low back pain. McKenzie identifies frequency of flexion as a second factor that can put a person at risk for the condition. Lastly, McKenzie postulates that one of the factors that makes us more likely to experience low back pain is a limited extension range.

In contrast to Williams, McKenzie maintains that an accumulation of flexion forces, not extension forces, is what increases the pressures on the posterior elements of the disc, and that this is what causes the problem. Williams, on the other hand, maintains that extension forces are what increase these pressures. I am aware that I am simplifying the situation here, but that is what they said!

Gary Jacob, a colleague of mine, was the one who stated that it wasn’t when he stood up that problems began; rather, it was when he sat down to think about it that problems began. While Williams claimed that man developed back pain when he stood up, I once heard Gary Jacob say that. To make sure that my point of view isn’t misunderstood, I don’t think the disc is the root of the problem. It’s possible that it is at times, but most of the time, it’s probably not involved at all. Here, all I’m doing is reporting what other people have written.

The Goals of the Treatment

Both Williams and McKenzie had similar treatment objectives in many ways, and those objectives were similar to one another. Both of them instructed their patients in various methods of self-control and attempted to educate their patients on the causes that, according to them, led to the onset of the patients’ back pain in the first place.

Williams was very clear about the objectives of his treatment. These objectives could be elucidated by him “The first rule to follow if you suffer from leg and back pain is… Always find a way to sit, stand, walk, and lie down that minimizes the amount of hollow that develops in the low back.” His main goal was to make the lumbar curve less pronounced and straighten out the spine.

McKenzie, on the other hand, was more inclined toward the utilization of extension as a potential treatment method. This was especially clear in the earlier works that he had produced. For the McKenzie aficionados who are reading this and are working up a sweat, let me assure you that I am well aware that McKenzie is much more than an extension. However, it does appear that the majority of patients can benefit from extension exercises; this is where the connection with extension comes from.

In the end, McKenzie desired a complete range of motion in all directions, which represents a significant departure from Williams’ goals in this regard. While Williams instructed everyone to use the same strategy, McKenzie tailored his procedures to meet the needs of each individual patient. In the beginning of his treatment for some patients, he had them perform extension exercises. In some of them, he started with the flexion. Still others begin with a lateral shift movement or whatever else is necessary in order to control and centralize their pain.

Initial Medical Care

In addition to providing treatment, both Williams and McKenzie made an effort to instruct their patients in proper first aid procedures and exercises. Williams preferred the squat and bounce technique, which is a method that I find to be especially helpful (the squat, not the bounce). McKenzie instructed his patients to perform various movements in order to centralize their pain, such as extending their spines by performing press-ups, bringing their knees to their chests, or sliding sideways.

Let’s look at the similarities between these processes, even though they might appear to be very different at first glance. Every single one of these clinicians instructed their patients on how to manage their back pain through physical activity. Although the movements that they suggested may have been different, the overall concept of utilizing movement as a means to control pain was analogous and novel.

The Various Methods of Treatment

When it came to the question of which kind of movement was more likely to be beneficial in terms of relieving back pain, Williams and McKenzie had opposing points of view. Williams’ way of thinking was somewhat more constrained than other people’s. He was certain that extension was undesirable while flexion was desirable. McKenzie was a little more adaptable and recognized that a treatment that is successful with one patient might not be successful with another. They both used movement, and they both encouraged self-control and activity, but McKenzie adapted his treatment methods to the requirements and reactions of his patients, as was stated earlier. He also varied his treatment procedures in accordance with these modifications.

Which Is Better?

If you have been waiting for me to tell you which of the two methods is superior, I will now do so. It depends: it could be Williams, it could be McKenzie, or it could be neither of them. I have my thoughts, but ultimately it is your responsibility to decide how to treat your patients.

Please take note that I recently came across an intriguing article, “The Control of Early Morning Lumbar Flexion for the Reduction of Chronic Low Back Pain That Is Not Specific to Any One Area of the Back A Study That Is Randomized And Controlled “(Snook et al., Spine, Dec 1, 1998;23(23):2601-7). The control of lumbar flexion in the early morning will significantly reduce chronic, nonspecific low back pain, according to the hypothesis that will be tested in the randomized controlled trial that is described in the article.

Randomization was used to divide 85 patients suffering from chronic or recurrent low back pain into two groups: the treatment group and the control group. The treatment group was given instructions on how to maintain control of their lumbar flexion in the early morning. A fake treatment consisting of six exercises that have been shown to be ineffective in reducing low back pain was given to the control group. Six months later, the treatment being tested was administered to the group serving as the control.

In the treatment group, there was a discernible lessening of the levels of pain experienced, but this was not the case in the control group. The control group’s responses after receiving the experimental treatment were very similar to those of the experimental group. There was also a notable decrease in the total number of days spent with pain, disability, impairment, and the consumption of medication. The authors came to the conclusion that a form of self-care that has the potential to reduce the pain and costs associated with chronic, nonspecific low back pain is to control lumbar flexion in the early morning.

Posted on

Bobath vs Brunstrom Approach

What is Bobath Approach

The Bobath concept is a problem-solving approach that is used in the evaluation and treatment of individuals who have disturbances in their movement and postural control as a result of a lesion to the central nervous system.

[1] It was Berta Bobath, a physiotherapist, and her husband Karl Bobath, a psychiatrist and neuropsychiatrist, who first proposed using this method to treat patients who suffered from anomalies in their Central Nervous Systems. Consequently, this method bears their names.

They came up with this method in order to effectively manage the neuro-motor dysfunctions that are characteristic of children who have cerebral palsy (CP). In the past, the most common forms of intervention included the use of braces, passive stretching, and surgery. The Bobath concept offered a new reference that considered children with cerebral palsy to struggle with issues related to postural control and movement in opposition to gravity [2].

In 1983, a group of experienced Bobath instructors came together and founded an international association with the intention of facilitating the development of Bobath Concept. The organization has been operating under the name International Bobath Instructor Training Association (IBITA)[1] since the year 1996.

What exactly is NDI?

The neurodevelopmental treatment is based on the premise that normal postural reflex mechanisms are essential to the performance of a motor skill. This is the basis for the treatment. The righting and equilibrium reactions, reciprocal innervation, and coordination patterns are the components that make up the normal postural reflex mechanisms. The release of abnormal tone and tonic reflexes, which can be seen in children with cerebral palsy (CP), interfered with the development of righting and equilibrium reactions 

It is an interactive approach to problem-solving that focuses on continuing reassessment with attention to individual goals, developing working hypotheses, treatment plans, and relevant objective measures to evaluate interventions. In other words, it pays attention to the individual.

This method is applicable to patients of any age who have sustained damage to their central nervous system, regardless of the severity of that damage. This distinguishes the approach from other forms of treatment, such as motor relearning or constraint-induced movement therapy, both of which can only be effective on individuals with a high level of functioning[1].

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health is adhered to by it perfectly. It places an emphasis on two interdependent aspects that are important for optimizing the recovery of motor function after a stroke:

control of one’s posture in relation to one’s performance on a task and

control over individual movements in order to produce sequences of movements that are coordinated with one another.

In addition, the Bobath concept has traditionally placed a significant amount of emphasis on the role that sensory inputs play in both the control and learning of motor skills.

The Bobath Concept Applied in a Clinical Setting

Motor control

The Bobath Concept is concerned with the patient’s sensory, perceptual, and adaptive behavior in addition to the motor problem that affects the entire patient. It is an approach that is goal-oriented as well as task-specific, with the purpose of organizing the internal (proprioceptive) and external (exteroceptive) environment of the nervous system in order to facilitate the effective operation of the individual. It is a process that involves interaction between the patient and the therapist [3].

The following are the primary focuses of therapy:neuromuscular system, the spinal cord, and higher centers to effect changes in motor performance, neuroplasticity, a nervous system that interacts with one another, and the individual expression of movement all come into play. overcoming a reduction in neural drive caused by damage to the UMN through the selective activation of receptors in the skin and the muscles [3].

It is important for therapists to be familiar with the fundamentals of motor learning, which include active participation, opportunities for practice, and meaningful goals. Training in the Bobath concept must be conducted in a variety of actual life settings, as opposed to merely performing exercises in the therapy department. Muscle activation patterns and sensory input that are specific to the task allow for successful completion of the task in a variety of contexts and environments, taking into account the requirements of both perceptual and cognitive processing [1].

During therapy, abnormal, repetitive movement patterns that get in the way of function will be addressed (IBITA 2007). Its purpose is to improve residual function while simultaneously preventing the development of spasticity. Through manipulation of muscle length and range, therapists have the ability to exert non-neurological control over hypertonia.

The goal of the therapist’s work on tone is not to normalize tone but rather to improve movement. There are three ways to lower tone:

  • the loosening up of tight muscles and arthritic joints,
  • elongation of the muscle,
  • practice of movement patterns that are closer to normal, and
  • by carrying out operational responsibilities in a manner that is both more effective and requires less effort
  • weight-bearing.
  • Sense organs and apparatus
  • Musculoskeletal system

The Bobath method addresses the issues that arise as a result of damage to the developing central nervous system and have an effect on a person’s sensory-motor, cognitive, perceptual, social, and emotional development. These issues are caused by damage to the developing nervous system.

It is not a method, but rather an approach or a concept. It acknowledges that even clients with the most severe forms of neurodisability have the potential for improved function.

It acknowledges the necessity of conducting a comprehensive assessment of each patient’s functional skills. Given the current state of knowledge and evidence Patients who have suffered neurological injuries can benefit greatly from this strategy during the rehabilitation process.

The term “neuro-developmental treatment” is the term that is most commonly used to describe the Bobath concept in the United States (NDT). It is predicated on the brain’s inherent capacity for reorganization (neuroplasticity)

Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech and language therapists are all involved in this approach because it is a multidisciplinary approach. People who have a pathophysiology of the central nervous system have difficulties with their posture and movement, which leads to limitations in their functional activities.

The NDT/Bobath approach is continually improved as new concepts, theoretical frameworks, and empirical findings emerge within the field of movement studies. Although there have been modifications made to the general idea behind NDT, certain aspects have not changed.

The following are aspects that have not changed:

  • It focuses on finding solutions to problems and making evaluations.
  • Tone has a direct impact on the functional tasks that a person is tasked with performing and plays an important part in movement pattern and postural control.
  • The primary method for improving both functional and postural performance of tasks is handling those tasks.
  • During the course of treatment, individuals are strongly encouraged to engage in active participation.
  • The importance of functional training in relation to developmental milestones
  • Aspects that have been modified include the following:
  • Tone has the potential to influence both neural and non-neural components.
  • It’s not often that spasticity is a major contributor to a patient’s movement disorders.

In addition, as the characteristics of the population affected by CNS pathophysiology shift over time, the approach is constantly evolving to accommodate these shifts.

What about the Brunstrom Approach

The Brunnstrom approach is a form of movement therapy that is utilized by a large number of clinicians today. The recovery of stroke patients is the primary focus of this method, which places a strong emphasis on the synergic pattern of spastic muscles at each stage of the process. This method does not offer any type of specialized training for its practitioners.

This method was developed in the 1960s by a Swedish physical therapist by the name of Signe Brunnstrom. Her research on hemiplegia was grounded in a number of established neurophysiological theories of motor control. She utilized a number of different trial and error methods, gauging responses, both motor and verbal, to each procedure or based on observations of patients. Stroke patients can be rehabilitated using a variety of approaches; however, there is very little evidence to support these approaches.

Brunnstrom developed the principles of movement strategy by making assumptions about the motor control and reactions of stroke patients. These assumptions formed the basis for the principles. The following is a list of these [1]:

Recovery from stroke appears to result in development in reverse as reflexes are used to facilitate and learn purposeful movements. Reflexes become modified into purposeful movements during normal motor development; however, recovery appears to result in development in reverse during this process. Brunnstrom held the view that no reasonable training method should be overlooked and stated, “It may very well be that a subcortical motion synergy that can be elicited on a reflex basis may serve as a wedge by means of which limited amount of willed movement can be learned.” Brunnstrom held this view because he believed that no reasonable training method should be left untried.

It is possible to elicit the desired motion or tonal changes by employing proprioceptive and exteroceptive stimulation.

After a stroke, the patient’s recovery of voluntary movement occurs in stages, beginning with mass patterns and progressing to discrete movements under their own control. The repetitive motions are referred to as limb synergies.

Learning new movements requires a lot of practice and repetition.

Learning is facilitated when it is done in the context of the ADLs.

The following is a list of the fundamental principles of movement therapy:

The treatment proceeds in the order of development, beginning with reflexes and moving on to voluntary and then functional movements.

  • When there is no motion, movement can be facilitated by using reflexes, associated reactions, and proprioceptive/exteroceptive stimuli to develop muscle tension. This can be done even when there is no motion.
  • When combined with voluntary effort, reflexes and associated reactions produce semi-voluntary movement, which in turn provides sensory feedback and satisfaction.
  • Movement can be elicited by providing a variety of stimuli to the subject. In contrast, a tactile stimulus will only allow the muscles in the stimulated area to respond, whereas resistance (a form of proprioceptive stimulation) will cause impulses to spread to other muscles and produce a reaction associated with them.
  • If the patient makes a voluntary effort, the clinician will ask them to maintain (isometric) a response. It is requested of him that, if at all possible, he perform an eccentric contraction (controlled lengthening) followed by a concentric contraction (controlled shortening).
  • Even if there is a possibility of only partial movement, the reversal of movement is emphasized throughout each session.
  • As soon as the patient demonstrates voluntary control, facilitation techniques are immediately discontinued. As a result of the low level of stereotypicality in responses to exteroceptive stimuli, tactile stimuli are the last to be eliminated. After stage 3, there is no longer any use for the primitive reflexes.
  • The performance of activities of daily living (ADL) similar to those already performed voluntarily is emphasized more
  • After the correct movement has been elicited, it needs to be practiced and repeated.

An evaluation is carried out in order to decide on a course of treatment and to determine the outlook for the condition. It includes determining the following, among other things:

This test evaluates the patient’s ability to identify movements and touches without having to look. The results either provide the therapist with an indication that they should use visual feedback to compensate for lost sensation or assist in the choice of which facilitation technique the therapist should use.degree of return to previous levels of voluntary control

Brunnstrom provided a list of stages of recovery for the hand, as well as the upper and lower extremities.

The following describes the stages of recovery for both the upper and lower extremities[2]:

The progression looks like this for the hand:

  • The involved side displays flaccidity in the muscles.
  • The patient shows no or very little evidence of spasticity, and active finger flexion is either impossible or very difficult.
  • The patient is able to keep their grip on a handle that has been placed in their hand, but they are unable to release it by voluntarily extending their fingers. There is a possibility of reflex extension.
  • The patient is able to release the pressure by making a lateral movement with their thumb while extending their fingers only slightly or by using their normal functional synergy. That is to say, he or she is able to grasp with the fingers while the wrist is extended and is also able to release the grasp with the fingers while the wrist is flexed.
  • The patient is able to voluntarily extend the mass of their digits, and they can control both a cylindrical and spherical grasp, albeit with limited functionality.
  • The patient exhibits voluntary extension of fingers, lateral, palmar, and three-point prehension, and individual finger movements are possible. Individual finger movements are possible.

Despite the fact that patients progress through these stages, a patient in particular may cease treatment at any stage. There is currently no method that can accurately predict how patients who have suffered a stroke will fare in their road to recovery.

During the evaluation process, there is no facilitation used. Each motion is first demonstrated on the patient’s unaffected side, and then the patient is asked to perform it on their affected side on their own volition.

On the basis of Twitchell and Brunnstrom’s concept of sequential stages of motor return in the hemiplegic stroke patient, the Fugl-Meyer scale was developed as the first quantitative evaluative instrument for measuring sensorimotor stroke recovery. The Fugl-Meyer scale was the first instrument of its kind. The Fugl-Meyer is a clinical examination method that has been extensively tested on the stroke population. This method is well-designed, and it is both feasible and effective. The motor domain, which is worth a total of 100 points and has been subjected to the most in-depth evaluation, is its primary value. [3] Despite this, the Fugl-Meyer test is still relevant, and it is possible that this is because it uses a hierarchical scoring system that is based on the level of difficulty in carrying out the tasks. [4]

Stages Pattern

  • The patient shows signs of flaccidity, including very little or no resistance to passive motion and no initiation of voluntary movement.
  • Spasticity starts to develop, and the beginning of synergies is possible, either as a result of voluntary effort or an associated reaction.
  • Because of spasticity, there is increased resistance, and limb synergies are performed voluntarily.
  • Spasticity is less noticeable than it was earlier, and it is now possible to combine movements in ways that are distinct from synergies.
  • There is very little resistance from spasticity, and independent of synergy, it is possible to perform individual movements as well as complex movement combinations.
  • It is challenging to demonstrate spasticity unless the movements being performed are done so quickly, and synergies do not get in the way of the performance.

The influence that tonic reflexes have on the movement of the patient

When there is no movement present, an evaluation of the patient’s tonic reflexes is necessary to start the treatment process. Asymmetrical and symmetrical tonic neck reflexes, tonic labyrinthine and lumbar reflexes, and tonic neck reflexes are the types of primitive reflexes that are typically present.

The influence that associated reactions have on the movement of the patient. Involuntary movement or patterned reflexive tonal increase in those muscles that are anticipated to be in contrast to cause movement are associated reactions. When other unaffected extremities are resisted or when effort is made in an affected extremity, these reactions are seen in the extremities that have been affected. These are assessed so that it can be determined which method of facilitation can be used.

The following reactions are associated with patients who have suffered a stroke:

  • Flexor Synergy
  • Extensor Synergy

The Phenomenon of Raimeste’s (Resistance to Hip abduction or adduction of noninvolved extremity causes same motion in involved leg)

When there is resistance to the flexion of the non-involved leg, the involved extremity will extend, and when there is resistance to the extension of the non-involved side, the involved extremity will flex.

The involved hand will react with a grasping motion if the grasp of the non-involved hand is resisted. When the patient tries to flex the leg or when the patient’s attempt to flex the leg is resisted, flexor movement or tone may be elicited in the involved arm. The term for this kind of reaction is homolateral synkinesis.

Souque’s Phenomenon occurs when the tone of the involved arm is increased above horizontal, which causes the fingers to extend and abduct.

The Bobath approach is focused on preventing abnormal patterns of movement and promoting normal motor development. This approach is based on the principle that movement is a fundamental aspect of human development and that abnormal patterns of movement can interfere with normal motor development. The Bobath approach is designed to promote normal motor development by providing an environment that encourages normal movement patterns and by providing opportunities for practice and reinforcement of these patterns.

On the other hand, The Brunstrom approach is focused on using the abnormal pattern of movement for functional activities. This approach helps to improve the quality of life for patients with various neurological disorders. The focus on using the abnormal pattern of movement helps to improve the coordination and balance of the patient. This approach is also beneficial in helping the patient to regain their independence.